In the newsletter publication, the writer suggested that having several meals together by families could help teenagers shun away from improper behaviorial act. This recommendation by the author arose from a recent study which reported that 30 percent of 5000 teenagers have meals with their families and adolescents which ate more meals per week with their families are less probable to associate themselves with illegal drugs, tobacco, and alcohol. Though, the argument seems convincing at first glance, upon further contemplation, the arguments depends on unwarranted assumptions and there are some questions needed to be answered before the acceptance of such recommendations by the author.
First, what is the assurance that the survey carried out on 5000 adolescents is adequate to hold such tenable conclusion?. Tis is because the author failed to give a meticulous record of the teenagers who were surveyed which include the age group of the selected teens, their gender as well as the area where this study took place and this lack of information counters the accuracy of the survey. For instance, it is possible that teenagers with lower age bracket were questioned or only the female genders participated in the study as well as smaller portion of particular area was considered and these cannot justify the author’s claims. Therefore, since such key factors were not elaborated by the author, this argument does not hold water and such claim is unsupported and undeveloped.
Furthermore, it was reported that 30 percent of the adolescents ate minimum of seven meals per weeks with their families, however, yet another of the argument deficiencies is that it provides no information about the 70 percent juvenile. In addition, the author claimed that only this 30 percent teens are least likely to have being involved in illegalities but this postulation is unsubstantial because the rate at which a teenager eats with his family if high or low does not determine whether he takes drugs or alcohol. The author failed to provide concrete evidence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolescents (70 percent) probably are not unable to eat with their families due to unavailability of their family member or they attend boarding school, does that warrant that they are bad kids who do drugs or drink alcohol?. This shows that such conclusion is incoherent and seem not to align with the given facts. It is clearly obvious that the author's argument is rife with holes and thus, not strong enough.
Additionally, how does family meals correlate with one’s academic achievement, self-esteem or mood?. The argument remains unrelated because the writer did not show proof to why such claim can affect teenagers in these ways. To begin with, the author suggested a teenager who have family meals often do have less problem regarding low grades in school, on the contrary, he failed to provide more details about this claim because it is likely that such teenagers have high IQ or study hard to do excellently well. Moreover, the argument on the relationship between adolescents having low self-esteem and depression to family meal seem baseless because of the failure to present solid proof due to the fact that there is no certainty that teens who didn’t fall into the category of eating often with their families end up feeling depressed or lack confidence. Maybe if the author had included factors that apprehends the lack of family meals such as family conflict or bad heredity traits, then such assumption would have being considered reasonable. Consequently, the argument have no clear connection, rendering such assumptions illogical.
In conclusion, the author’s claim relies in several unwarranted assumptions and in order to reach a tenable conclusion, the above questions must be answered.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agers have meals with their families and adolescents which ate more meals per wee...
^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dolescents which ate more meals per week with their families are less probable ...
^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... meals per week with their families are less probable to associate themselves w...
^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with their families are less probable to associate themselves with illegal dru...
^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers participated in the study as well as smaller portion of particular area was c...
^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: CAN_BACKUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to back up'?
Suggestion: to back up
...hor failed to provide concrete evidence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolesc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rete evidence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolescents 70 percent pro...
^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolescents 70 percent probably ar...
^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y member or they attend boarding school, does that warrant that they are bad kids...
^^
Line 5, column 959, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n facts. It is clearly obvious that the authors argument is rife with holes and thus, n...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... teenagers in these ways. To begin with, the author suggested a teenager who have...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the author suggested a teenager who have family meals often do have less problem ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 55.5748502994 139% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3213.0 2260.96107784 142% => OK
No of words: 615.0 441.139720559 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2243902439 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.56307096286 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80956130761 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 204.123752495 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 987.3 705.55239521 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5917671442 57.8364921388 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.65 119.503703932 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 23.324526521 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.70786347227 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246695713066 0.218282227539 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736534806404 0.0743258471296 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785029802717 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134097477384 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944593604923 0.0628817314937 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.3550499002 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 98.500998004 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 616 350
No. of Characters: 3135 1500
No. of Different Words: 293 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.982 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.089 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.717 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 220 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 171 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 124 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 76 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.365 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.514 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agers have meals with their families and adolescents which ate more meals per wee...
^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dolescents which ate more meals per week with their families are less probable ...
^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... meals per week with their families are less probable to associate themselves w...
^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with their families are less probable to associate themselves with illegal dru...
^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers participated in the study as well as smaller portion of particular area was c...
^^
Line 5, column 571, Rule ID: CAN_BACKUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to back up'?
Suggestion: to back up
...hor failed to provide concrete evidence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolesc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rete evidence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolescents 70 percent pro...
^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dence to backup his claim. Also, If the other adolescents 70 percent probably ar...
^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y member or they attend boarding school, does that warrant that they are bad kids...
^^
Line 5, column 959, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n facts. It is clearly obvious that the authors argument is rife with holes and thus, n...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... teenagers in these ways. To begin with, the author suggested a teenager who have...
^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the author suggested a teenager who have family meals often do have less problem ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 13.6137724551 176% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 55.5748502994 139% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3213.0 2260.96107784 142% => OK
No of words: 615.0 441.139720559 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2243902439 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97987886753 4.56307096286 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80956130761 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 204.123752495 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 987.3 705.55239521 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.8473053892 131% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5917671442 57.8364921388 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.65 119.503703932 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 23.324526521 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.70786347227 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246695713066 0.218282227539 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736534806404 0.0743258471296 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785029802717 0.0701772020484 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134097477384 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944593604923 0.0628817314937 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 14.3799401198 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 48.3550499002 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.197005988 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.5979740519 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 98.500998004 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 12.3882235529 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.1389221557 126% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.9071856287 160% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.