Summarize the main points of the lecture and highlight how the lecture interacts with the text.
Both the reading passage and lecture discuss whether online encyclopedias better than traditional printed encyclopedias. The former mentions that online encyclopedias has several disadvantages while the latter attacks each of the points mentioned in the text.
Firstly, the text mentions that traditional encyclopedias are written by the experts while online encyclopedias lacks identity. Online encyclopedias contains partial knowledge and can be edited by anyone. However, the lecturer argues that the exact comprehensive document cannot be find anywhere neither in the books nor online. Traditional encyclopedias are the binded books which has some errors from decades and those errors have never been corrected. Whereas Online encyclopedias can be easily edited if there is any incorrect or partial information.
Secondly, the passage mentions that even if the data has been correctly mentioned in traditional encyclopedias still there is a possibilty of hacking and corrupting the data. While, the lecturer contends that online encyclopedias have been protected from malicious activites like hacking or data corruption. The crucial data online has read only access. No one is allowed to edit the crucial data. Morover, the lecturer mentions that there are special editors supported online that monitor the users editing text as well as eliminate malicious data.
Lastly, the passage maintians that traditional encyclopedias add details after the agreement of experts whereas online encyclopedias have detailed information on trivial topics and less information on important topics. While the lecture argues that traditonal documents have limited spaces, so those documents have limited information. There is no space issue for online documents and posses a great diversity of information when it comes to expressing ideas. Thus a lot of space and platform to conatin diversity of ideas are the strongest benefits of online documents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 460, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tion when it comes to expressing ideas. Thus a lot of space and platform to conatin ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76655052265 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00663149502 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8986873303 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4375 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937999921471 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.036708227929 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447506337504 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702613610082 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339516294613 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 53.8541721854 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.