In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future

There is no shortage opinion about types of jobs in the past and market needed to fulfill any lack in jobs. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely select to agree with this idea because now days it is very hard to find job within your major. It is my firm belief that determine your plan for future in the past is easiest than today's decisions for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the next subsequent paragraphs.

To begin with, these days it is hard to identify what type of major you have to study or what career you should learn to have an outstanding job. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. 30 years ago, it was easy to study anything and have a job after graduate because there was scarcity in many positions in ministries or public sector. My father have graduated from the university as an a civil engineer before 30 years, and he had a job directly after graduation, so when I finished my school, I decided to study civil engineering like my father because jobs in this field are easy to obtain. Unfortunately, after graduation I did not find any job for four years because there are a lot of engineers in my country without work. If I had studied another major like cyber security, I would have found a job easily.

Secondly, professional jobs like smith and carpenter are also have problems to secure their life's because of increasing the population in the world and Increase the competition between them. Drawing from my own experience, in my town before ten years there were five grocery markets while today there are more than 12 markets like them. Consequently, their profits decreased and a lot of them tried to open another market or expand their markets to include another items like yoghurt and milk.

In conclusion, I strongly feel that planning for future jobs is more difficult today and it has many consequences. This is because there are more people how have certificates from universities without having job because all jobs are filled, and increasing number of people has another impact on all free jobs.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...r have graduated from the university as an a civil engineer before 30 years, and he ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 870, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... like cyber security, I would have found a job easily. Secondly, professional ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66931216931 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57447100481 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.3283618289 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.071428571 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17809845357 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065866960114 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521847194834 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100368578329 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471794901073 0.0645574589148 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.