In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge Write a

Essay topics:

In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge. Write at least 250 words.

In the technological era, there are lots of agriculture tools that are made which help tools produce more grain. In some parts of the world people argue that this advanced technology helps us in agriculture but still the nation goes to starvation.

I believe that main case of this problem is population. due to large number of population it is hard to deliver food to all individuals. For example, India and china has largest population. Moreover, lack of agriculture lend. near the city agriculture land are transferred to construct building and few land are use for industry purposes. Large proportion of company release bad chemical so it will affect the land. Another case for this low economy rates. Due this it will lead poverty. Poverty is s major underlying case of hunger. Many people cannot afford to buy or access sufficient for themselves and their family. The biggest one is climate change and natural disaster. Climate change affects agriculture productivity, water availability and food production.

The solution that I believe would be most effective is to improve infrastructure and market access. The government should have a need to improve storage capacity of grain. It will help in crisis time. Another solution is to support smallholder farmers. National authorities should need to establish some policy to help farmers who have low income and provide resources and market opportunity. Seed company should need to produce hybrid seed. As a result, it will help to address climate change. All people should be take cake about reduce food lost and waste.

In conclusion, although technology has increased food production, many people are still starving because they do not have enough money to buy food. To improve this situation, governments need to develop their economies so that even the poorest can find work to feed themselves.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-23 shalin63 67 view
2023-01-12 ielts_tony 67 view
2022-05-03 Sarina2021 78 view
2021-09-27 Lunar Tran 89 view
2021-04-26 pateldhruv1708 78 view
Essays by user shalin63 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...ain case of this problem is population. due to large number of population it is har...
^^^
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the largest'.
Suggestion: has the largest
...dividuals. For example, India and china has largest population. Moreover, lack of agricultu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Near
...on. Moreover, lack of agriculture lend. near the city agriculture land are transferr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Due this it will lead poverty. Poverty is s major underlying case of hunger. Ma...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1926910299 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78997380265 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6323579146 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.125 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5416666667 20.7667163134 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70833333333 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171481642378 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451475087232 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502836491046 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101988187858 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466099061242 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.93 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.