Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There are a lot of way for people to gain their information and become a knowledgeable person. Some people prefer to obtain their information from different sources, but I completely disagree with this idea for the following reasons.
Firstly, it can waste people's time. Nowadays, people experience a huge advancement and improvement in different field of science and engineering such as nano, robotic, and the internet. These new inventions help people to save their time, because the one source have enough information for the person to become knowledgeable. For example, people now can easily connect to the internet and surf a website and access to their requirement information without any difficulty. However, they must spend a lot of time and go and access to the other sources in the library and stores.
In addition, it can waste people's money. Today, because of the unsuitable economic conditions around the world, people have to start working in the morning and continue their work until late at night. They need to earn more money for food, clothes, university’s tuition etc. So, if they want to check several sources like books, newspaper, the websites, and journals, they must spend a lot of money for buying books, journals, and the internet. So, it is impossible and unreasonable for the people who live in a difficult situation.
On the other hand some people think that it is necessary for the individuals check several sources to become well-informed. Mostly, they can familiarize with other issues. For example, when the physics students want to search about the nuclear forces, if they look up to several books and website, they will see some new discovery about other topics such as optic, or nano. So, alongside with learning about nuclear physics, they can gain useful information about other branch of physics. However, I still do not agree with checking several sources, because the physics students can look at one valid website which every second up to date and show the new information.
In conclusion, there a lot of reason to prove my claim that it is not necessary for the people to look up several sources to become well informed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, so, still, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05833333333 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74516269279 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8837872422 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.166666667 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998941962394 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365924640033 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402028441249 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718072106792 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464092533862 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.