TPO42
In the reading section, the writer contends that there are several solutions that responsible businesses can use to prevent injuries to birds; however, in the lecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by presenting several reasons and examples.
First of all, the writer claims that one-way glass in which birds cannot see through are good enough for discouraging birds to fly through them; on the other hand, the professor take issue with this notion and explains that these windows would be considered as mirrors for birds; The professor states that inasmuch as birds cannot understand mirrors they consider them as part of the nature and continue fly through them; hence, the problem would not be solved, as professor believes.
Moreover, the writer also manifests that colorful windows with an openings is another possible solutions; in contrast, the lecture again rejects this statement and explains that if the opening would be so big, the birds would consider them as a space in which they are able fly through; in contrast, should the space would be so small, people inside the building would have difficulties since inside the building would be dark.
In addition, the writer also states that creating an artificial magnetic field would be another possible solution; on the contrary, the professor again rejects this belief by stating that birds use magnetic field when traveling very far distances, but for short trips they do not use this method instead they use their eyes and visions' abilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by presenting sev...
^^
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an opening' or simply 'openings'?
Suggestion: an opening; openings
...so manifests that colorful windows with an openings is another possible solutions; in contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s method instead they use their eyes and visions abilities.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21774193548 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44252347291 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540322580645 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 62.0 21.2450331126 292% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.6226071625 49.2860985944 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 323.5 110.228320801 293% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 62.0 21.698381199 286% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 31.5 7.06452816374 446% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353466921798 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186725877231 0.0996497079465 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814097055093 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186725877231 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814097055093 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 34.2 13.3589403974 256% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 17.01 53.8541721854 32% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.3 11.0289183223 238% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.7273730684 261% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.8 10.498013245 255% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 27.0 11.2008830022 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.