The argument claims that it needs to allocate a greater share of its budget next year for advertising. The claim of the argument is based on the premise that the veiwership of Super Screen produced movies has decreased, even after positive feedback by critics for some of these movies. The argument beleives this trend is because of the lack of awareness among viwers. The recommendation of the argument is unsound and a lot of evidence is needed in order to evaluate the recommendation.
First, the author claims that fewer people have attended Super Screen produced movies. The claim is based on vague terms, we need more evidence to evaluate how fewer are the people. It could be possible that the dwindling numnbers have been reduced by a viewership of 10 people in comparison to a million viewers. The recommendation will not be reasonable as it would cost a company a lot of money to advertise just for a decrease of a minimal number of viewers.
Second, the author claims that the problem of a decrease in viewership is not because of the quality of his movies. The author clearly mentions not all but for a specific number of Super Screen movies the reviews have been positive. The use of vague language gives no concrete evidence on how many movies have received positive reviews. For instance, out of 50 movies only 3 movies have the percentage reviews actually increased. This is not a large enough number to determine that the viewership has not decreased because of poor quality of Super Screen produced movies. Hence, the recommendation would not be of any use.
Finally, even if the decrease was not based on the quality of the movies, no evidence about the percentage of increase in positive reviews being significant for the company to adhere to the recommendation have been provided. For example, probably the increase has been of a 1% or a 2%. These are not significant numbers on which such a recomendation can be built upon. Hence, increasing the advertising budget would do no good.
Based on these arguments the recommendation by the marketing team to increase the advertising budget has a lot of flaws and more information is needed for the recommendation to be reasonable. Until more evidence is provided, the recommendation is unsound and open to debate.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The claim of the argument is based on the premise that the veiwership of Super Screen produced movies has decreased, even after positive feedback by critics for some of these movies.
Error: veiwership Suggestion: viewers
Sentence: The argument beleives this trend is because of the lack of awareness among viwers.
Error: viwers Suggestion: viewers
Error: beleives Suggestion: believes
Sentence: It could be possible that the dwindling numnbers have been reduced by a viewership of 10 people in comparison to a million viewers.
Error: numnbers Suggestion: numbers
Sentence: These are not significant numbers on which such a recomendation can be built upon.
Error: recomendation Suggestion: recommendation
----------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not exactly
----------------
here goes a sample:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 388 350
No. of Characters: 1856 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.438 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.784 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.843 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.473 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.32 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.536 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.096 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ck by critics for some of these movies. The argument beleives this trend is because...
^^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of the lack of awareness among viwers. The recommendation of the argument is unsou...
^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n how many movies have received positive reviews. For instance, out of 50 movies ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 388.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90979381443 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9023170586 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 204.123752495 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430412371134 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 705.55239521 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6966441693 57.8364921388 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.70786347227 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205663330956 0.218282227539 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650706531256 0.0743258471296 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846447388184 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10918458676 0.128457276422 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845975666343 0.0628817314937 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.