In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro

Essay topics:

In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patrol, many drivers are exceeding the speed limit. Prunty County should instead undertake the same kind of road improvement project that Butler County completed five years ago: increasing lane widths, resurfacing rough highways, and improving visibility at dangerous intersections. Today, major Butler County roads still have a 55 mph speed limit, yet there were 25 percent fewer reported accidents in Butler County this past year than there were five years ago.

The argument claims that the road accidents reported at Prunty Country last year were not lowered even after the speed was limited from 55 to 45 miles per hour. Due the fail of attempt Prunty country want to follow the same step as Butler Country to improvise the roads by increasing the lane width, resurfacing rough highways and improvising the visibility at dangerous interjections. This conclusion provided lies on mare assumptions and
do not provide in facts to support the decision. In order to support the decision the argument needs to provide some facts and gather some data on cause of road accidents.

First of all, their are no facts mentioned on average accidents happened before limiting the speed limit to 45 miles for hour and after the change. This data would be very crucial for this argument. There are lot many factors which might need to be taken into account.
For example, the road accidents might have increased only in rainy seasons. Such facts need to be taken into account before ruling out the various options available.

Secondly, the new strategy Prunty Country want to apply is improvising the road. The author inordre to support his claims presents the fact that it worked well for Butler Country. As Butler is totally different country we need to consider all the similarities and dissimilarities shared by the two. For example, Butler Country may have less population hence less accidents in there region. The arguments mentions that accidents in Butler country are reduced by 25% in 5 years of improvising the road. It is a undeniable fact that improvising the roads will benefit the Country, we also need to understand the consequences of doing it. Government might use the same money for many other important tasks.

Finally I would say that conclusion is made on mare assumptions and requires to collect data and facts on why did the attempt of reducing the speed failed. Then take the necessary actions towards the issue. Also, It is necessary to take in account differences between 2 countries before adapting the strategy followed by them. Improvising the roads is has it own advantages and will definitely help in reducing the accidents but
there might be various other economical ways to carry out the same task.

Votes
Average: 4.3 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the road accidents reported at Prunty Country last year were not lowered even ...
^^
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on provided lies on mare assumptions and do not provide in facts to support the d...
^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... of road accidents. First of all, their are no facts mentioned on average accid...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to account before ruling out the various options available. Secondly, the ne...
^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accidents is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... Country may have less population hence less accidents in there region. The argument...
^^^^
Line 9, column 405, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'mention'.
Suggestion: mention
...ccidents in there region. The arguments mentions that accidents in Butler country are re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 508, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... 5 years of improvising the road. It is a undeniable fact that improvising the ro...
^
Line 9, column 671, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it. Government might use the same money for many other important tasks. Fi...
^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... for many other important tasks. Finally I would say that conclusion is made on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 78, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'collecting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: collecting
...s made on mare assumptions and requires to collect data and facts on why did the attempt o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 360, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
...y them. Improvising the roads is has it own advantages and will definitely help in ...
^^^
Line 12, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itely help in reducing the accidents but there might be various other economical ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in fact, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 379.0 441.139720559 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00527704485 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62257449451 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525065963061 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 705.55239521 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4965228495 57.8364921388 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.85 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 23.324526521 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.15768463074 136% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154239406633 0.218282227539 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455031778313 0.0743258471296 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074820080735 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711055876425 0.128457276422 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836445580091 0.0628817314937 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

argument 1 -- not OK

argument 2 -- OK

argument 3 -- ???

----------------
minimum 3 arguments wanted.

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 02
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 379 350
No. of Characters: 1845 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.412 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.868 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.581 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.95 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.372 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.489 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5