Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain
I completely agree with the statement of protecting the remaining wilderness. The nation has to take necessary actions to prevent forests and wildlife. There are many adverse effects of cutting down the forest and we already facing them. I think this is the best time to wake up and realize it and take necessary action towards the wilderness. The Economic growth is a very important need for a nation but not on the bases of abolishing of wild life and forest. Earth is a home for all species and we don't have any rights to take away their lives.
We find an essential need to stop urbanizing the forest areas. The government has to enforce some solid rules and heavy penalty on people who try to violate the law. Even though we already have some solid rules lined up to prevent the wildlife, we still find gradual decrease in the forest areas which are the only habitat for wild life. The industries and builders try to persuade people to sell their lands to construct large buildings by chopping of the trees. People need to understand the consequences of such mistakes which can lead to heavy loss to the planet we live in. Forests are been destroyed to build houses , Large Industries, factories and for play grounds. This may lead to polluted urbane jungles destroying natural ones. Hence, making law is not sufficient, enforcing it and taking strong action towards it is also necessary.
There are many disadvantages of destroying the forests. First of all, it effects the balance in the ecosystem. We are already facing natural disasters like Tsunami, floods, heavy and unstoppable rains etc. These are the adverse effects of destroying of forests. The trees are source of living for human beings. Reduction in forest will not only cause harm to wild life but also to us. If we do not take necessary action to prevent forests soon we will find scarcity of food, water and suitable environment to live in. The forest destruction will cause global warming to increase and also low underground water, less rain falls which ultimately lead to desertification and many more. Researchers and Scientists could not find necessary resources to study due to lack of special trees and animals.
So in short, in-order to save flora and fauna we need to stop urbanizing the left over lands and try preventing the existing forests and wildlife. People have to protest against urbanization of land and government to enforce laws and take necessary actions to make people follow them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...already facing them. I think this is the best time to wake up and realize it and ...
^^
Line 1, column 503, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... Earth is a home for all species and we dont have any rights to take away their live...
^^^^
Line 4, column 622, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rests are been destroyed to build houses , Large Industries, factories and for pla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, still, as to, i think, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2064.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87943262411 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58645026844 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513002364066 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0023528598 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.56 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.92 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.32 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101584852324 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285972800121 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299722230256 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603635399045 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340109728804 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.