"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway, adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute, it is argued, thereby reducing rush-hour traffic."
The argument states solutions to the heavy traffic faced during rushed hours of the day on Blue Highways. The favored solution is building a new lane for motorists lobby and widen the high way. Adding a new lane to high was not a successful idea for Green Highways which faced a similar condition of heavy traffic during rushed hours. Hence, opponents have a alternate idea of introducing a lane for bicycle which will encourage people to use bicycles. Even though the statement is good enough to persuade people for choosing a health conscious way to avoid traffic, the argument has several loop holes and it doesnt provide sufficient proofs to support the decision of building a bicycle lane over a motorist lobby.
The favored solution by commuters is to create a motorist lobby. This solution need to be favored more because commuters are the people who are actually facing the issue everyday and they have a better idea of the situation during rushed hours. Creating a separate lane for bikes would free up the space for large vehicles like school and office buses and local buses. As this would also be helpful to avoid accidents causing on the highways.
Secondly, opponents suggest to have a bicycle lane over a bike lane because this idea did not work on Green Highways. This statement need further clarification regarding the similarities between traffic faced by the 2 highways. For example, Green Highways might have less motorists during rushed areas and hence creating a separate bike lane was not successful. On the other hand as commuters are favored in creating a bike lane strongly points out the increased number motorists on Blue Highways. Therefore, comparison between the two highways lies upon assumptions rather than strong evidences.
Thirdly, the newly proposed idea of creating a bicycle lane seems quite convincing to us also need some strong evidences. The author claims that residents of the city are keen bicyclist. Even though city is full of keen bicyclist, it is not necessary that these people are the ones who are commuting during rush hours. Also, people might not want to use bicycles during their commute hours. People might prefer to use bicycle during their workout hours rather than using it in commute hours. Even though this choice seems like a better idea. We need a strong yet more convincing evidences.
Therefore, in conclusion, the argument needs a strong evidence regarding the proposal of creating a bicycle lane over bike lane. Even though creating a bike lane on another Highway didn't work out and it lead to unnecessary chaos, it might not be the case for Blue highway. The city should estimate the number of 2 wheeler , 4 wheeler and other kind of automobiles used during rush hours and then decide which might be the relevant solution. Therefore, argument needs a strong evidences to claim the bicycle lane over motorists lobby.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 00 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 484 350
No. of Characters: 2359 1500
No. of Different Words: 206 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.69 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.874 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.436 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 176 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 89 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.36 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.919 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.52 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.508 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ing rushed hours. Hence, opponents have a alternate idea of introducing a lane fo...
^
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... argument has several loop holes and it doesnt provide sufficient proofs to support th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...eople who are actually facing the issue everyday and they have a better idea of the situ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...chool and office buses and local buses. As this would also be helpful to avoid acc...
^^
Line 8, column 21, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest having'.
Suggestion: suggest having
... the highways. Secondly, opponents suggest to have a bicycle lane over a bike lane because...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 268, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun motorists is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... For example, Green Highways might have less motorists during rushed areas and hence...
^^^^
Line 11, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... rather than using it in commute hours. Even though this choice seems like a better idea. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 182, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...creating a bike lane on another Highway didnt work out and it lead to unnecessary cha...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 204, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...n another Highway didnt work out and it lead to unnecessary chaos, it might not be t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 315, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'wheeler' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'wheelers'.
Suggestion: wheelers
...he city should estimate the number of 2 wheeler , 4 wheeler and other kind of automobil...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... should estimate the number of 2 wheeler , 4 wheeler and other kind of automobiles...
^^
Line 13, column 327, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'wheeler' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'wheelers'.
Suggestion: wheelers
...ld estimate the number of 2 wheeler , 4 wheeler and other kind of automobiles used duri...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 477, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'evidence'?
Suggestion: evidence
...ion. Therefore, argument needs a strong evidences to claim the bicycle lane over motorist...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bicycle lane over motorists lobby.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2431.0 2260.96107784 108% => OK
No of words: 483.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.033126294 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51109398996 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 204.123752495 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43685300207 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2550814826 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.24 119.503703932 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.32 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.25449101796 266% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.20758483034 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235256508762 0.218282227539 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760082615304 0.0743258471296 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505418825413 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142324597216 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389392014598 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.