Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The Government should definitely should solve problems of the society for well being of the citizens. The problems can be severe like scarcity of drinking water, poverty, environmental pollution, shelter for homeless, education to needy or the problems which are not severe such as improvising roads and transportation, improvising the education system, employment etc. There are lot of problems which need to be solved and taken care by government but the problems should be prioritized and server problems should be given higher importance. The government has to solve immediate problems before solving problems which are just estimated to happen in future. This is very true for the well being of society.
Firstly, government has to consider immediate problems over future estimated problems because immediate problems tend to harm the citizens and can create new problems in the future. For example, if people are suffering with scarcity of drinking water and there is a possibility of heavy floods to happen in the city. The government has to issue funds to provide immediate supply of water to citizens rather than using the same funds to build new damns to save the rain water for future caused due to floods. Even though saving water in future may benefit the residents with drinking water reserved for upcoming years, the right thing to do now is save them from the current problem.
Secondly, for a government to rule for many more years they have to keep their focus on current problems of the citizens. The problems faced by people nowadays are scarcity of water, global worming, poverty, education to everyone. With a new government formed, citizens will expect them to tackle the current problems which are visible to them. Hence, if governments should put efforts to solve the today's problem which will provide them the majority support from the people and also boost the nations development and long term well being.
If we consider the problems with a certain deep insightful thoughts one can realize that today's problems correlated to tomorrows problems. Ineffective use of energy, fuels and resources would lead to scarcity of these resources in future. Today we can improve our transportation, technology etc to give a better life to people this would help them lead a easy and civilized life. This would also cause the scarcity of resources in future and hence government has to come up with alternate ways to tackle these problems like global worming, nonrenewable resources and environmental pollution. Hence, along with solving today's problems and at the same time government should take care and preserve resources for betterment of the future.
Hence, its the duty of government should majorly focus on solving today's problems than the future ones and at the same time avoid causing new problems while tackling with current issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 544, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...lems should be given higher importance. The government has to solve immediate probl...
^^^
Line 1, column 650, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lems which are just estimated to happen in future. This is very true for the well being o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...rnments should put efforts to solve the todays problem which will provide them the maj...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 495, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...port from the people and also boost the nations development and long term well being. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...elopment and long term well being. If we consider the problems with a certain...
^^
Line 10, column 229, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...uld lead to scarcity of these resources in future. Today we can improve our transportati...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 355, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ife to people this would help them lead a easy and civilized life. This would als...
^
Line 13, column 8, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...r betterment of the future. Hence, its the duty of government should majorly f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20474137931 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64499192353 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45474137931 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8486837675 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.105263158 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452109668901 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165013581584 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137722923021 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28245934555 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683211022427 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.