People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Glancing back through the history of various countries. one will undoubtedly notice that many remarkable changes have been sparkled by people questioning the rules and authorities. I agree to the point that making your point of view clearer and questioning the rules is most important to bring changes to the political and economical state of government. This applies to all the countries. The modern history is an best example to show the differences that people made by questioning the authorities. Hence, I definitely agree with the statement of question the rules and authorities rather accepting them passively unless it is taken to very extreme levels which can hinder the growth of country.
Take, for example , the formation of India. For years under the British rule citizens were unfairly taxed and treated in accordance with British rule. The 16th and 17th centuries were most horrifying for people while they suffered injustice due to foreign rule. This hindered the economy of the country as well. British looted India left and right for the 2 centuries and almost 10% of Indian revenue was transferred to England which had a huge adverse effect on economy of the under developed country like India. It took a while for people to understand that questioning the authorities for their individual rights and as well for betterment of the country is necessary to end injustice. Years later, when released from British rule, their original questioning of rules and authorities lead India to take different authoritative stand against the British rule. This brought an end to the sufferings of people and a new government to form the economy. This change was very crucial for a country like India were poverty lies in a very prominent place. But, if we talk about the modern history even the strong countries like America , France also suffered from British rule which lead to hardship and starvation for local people. Hence, questioning the authorities is not specific to the individual level but is also damn important at national level.
Some might claim that questioning the authorities might imply violent action in case of civil change, that one cannot exist without another. This is certainly not the case. Take, for example, Mahatma Gandhi who played a prominent role in obtaining the independence for India lead a non violent path to achieve it. Even though some people preferred to follow the violent path, his path of non violence inspired many people as well. The questioning of authorities, coupled with moral actions, lead the much tyranny and injustice throughout the world all through non-violent means.
This is not to say that I think that this statement is the best course of action in every situation for every person. Taking anything to extreme level has its own consequences.
In democratic countries like India, people choose their leaders to establish system of check and balance. Due to having a government which is to the people, for the people and of the people. In a system were every person questions every new rule, as the statement implies, political leaders must cater many different view points. These differences segregate population and hinder progress as well.
In essence, I agree with the point that questioning the authority, making your point clear to the upper authorities is not a problem and a very essential until a certain limit. It should not lead to certain extent that hinders the progress and brings differences between people. But I definitely, agree with the statement of question the rules and authorities rather accepting them passively unless it is taken to very extreme levels which can hinder the growth of people as a whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...rough the history of various countries. one will undoubtedly notice that many remar...
^^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ll the countries. The modern history is an best example to show the differences th...
^^
Line 1, column 413, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ll the countries. The modern history is an best example to show the differences th...
^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rowth of country. Take, for example , the formation of India. For years under...
^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sh rule citizens were unfairly taxed and treated in accordance with British rule....
^^
Line 4, column 1132, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y even the strong countries like America , France also suffered from British rule ...
^^
Line 12, column 303, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t implies, political leaders must cater many different view points. These differences segregat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3103.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1204620462 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6811808681 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450495049505 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 954.9 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7453871025 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.096774194 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5483870968 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90322580645 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27193989786 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670416941576 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705497818537 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142730154565 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918252252837 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.