"To combat the recently reported dramatic rise in cheating among college and university students, these institutions should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced an old-fashioned system in which students were closely monitored by teachers and an average of thirty cases of cheating per year were reported. The honor code has proven far more successful: in the first year it was in place, students reported twenty-one cases of cheating; five years later, this figure had dropped to fourteen. Moreover, in a recent survey conducted by the Groveton honor council, a majority of students said that they would be less likely to cheat with an honor code in place than without."
The cheating in academics is really increasing these days but the method suggested in the prompt is not viable to ensure that the exams in the colleges and schools are conducted in a cheating free atmosphere. The method suggested of the Honour code have a lot of pit holes and can fail in many situations. These evidences need to studied cleary to understand that what are the promblems with the new way suggested.
First of all, as the code states that it's the duty of student to vow to not cheat himself and to report it to the administration if he/she found anyone doing so. But in this theory, it is possible that any student who feel envy of any other student cam also able to report a false report just for his malignity. It might be also possible that the student reporting the case of cheating against someone else just do it for the sake of enjoyment. This kind of reports cannot be trustworthy, as professional exam instructor can be. We can trust a lliable exam instructor for his report but not a report which can be just a case of someone's eniviousness or enjoyment against someone else.
Furthermore, it is also possible for instance that in a particular class a tacit agreement maybe made for not reporting anyone's report and everyone can cheat. A class is generally filled with children of similar age group and they also have lot of bonding with each other. It maybe possible that all the students in a particular class nodded for aggrement to let everyone in the class to cheat and not to report any case to the administration. In this situation also we see that that honour code doesn't worked at all.
At last, it is also possible that in a particular class most of the testtakers are friend and have bona fide in each other. In class like this, not having the traditional exam instrructor can lead a major cheating scenario among the students. As the most of them are friends it might be possible that no report is filed at all.
Considering all the pit falls with the honour code theory I would like to conclude that this theory is not certainly better than the traditional method of exam instructor. We can rigidly agree with a reliable exam instructor but we can't agree with some kind of honour code theory prompted. It can disastrous for some student and just a way of enjoyment for others.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: These evidences need to studied cleary to understand that what are the promblems with the new way suggested.
Error: promblems Suggestion: problems
Error: cleary Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: We can trust a lliable exam instructor for his report but not a report which can be just a case of someone's eniviousness or enjoyment against someone else.
Error: lliable Suggestion: liable
Error: eniviousness Suggestion: enviousness
Sentence: It maybe possible that all the students in a particular class nodded for aggrement to let everyone in the class to cheat and not to report any case to the administration.
Error: aggrement Suggestion: agreement
Sentence: In this situation also we see that that honour code doesn't worked at all.
Error: honour Suggestion: honor
Error: doesn Suggestion: does
Sentence: At last, it is also possible that in a particular class most of the testtakers are friend and have bona fide in each other.
Error: fide Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: testtakers Suggestion: testers
Error: bona Suggestion: bond
Sentence: In class like this, not having the traditional exam instrructor can lead a major cheating scenario among the students.
Error: instrructor Suggestion: instructor
-------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 10 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 418 350
No. of Characters: 1875 1500
No. of Different Words: 181 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.522 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.486 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.545 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.562 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.568 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... First of all, as the code states that its the duty of student to vow to not cheat...
^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...e administration if he/she found anyone doing so. But in this theory, it is possible ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ation also we see that that honour code doesnt worked at all. At last, it is also p...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r cheating scenario among the students. As the most of them are friends it might b...
^^
Line 9, column 233, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... with a reliable exam instructor but we cant agree with some kind of honour code the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, really, so, for instance, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 28.8173652695 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 416.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59375 5.12650576532 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59748786061 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 204.123752495 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 705.55239521 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.251605318 57.8364921388 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196949969002 0.218282227539 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069843379149 0.0743258471296 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482888478718 0.0701772020484 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111046747773 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330938114122 0.0628817314937 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.3550499002 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.5979740519 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 98.500998004 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.