The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.
"Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in The group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field's conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation- The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures."
The article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist concede the the research conducted by Dr. Field--20 years ago, was invalid, as his graduate students was far accurate. For this claim, he have survey in the islands of Tertai and refuted The claim, Tertia children were reared by entire village by showing the fact of many children were talking about their biological Parents. However, his report unfairly assumes the condition by Three mentioned reasons.
There, the situation was highly changed between these intervals He did better give any clues or findings between these periods. He was better suggested to study the previous and past years scenario and could make better conclusion by his findings.
Secondly, he does not give any evidences regarding the number of population or respondents surveyed during his study. Perhaps, before 20 years, Dr. Fiels surveyed the required number of respondents, and now, Dr. Karp surveyed with limited number of respondents. Number of respondents during the survey effects the reliability of the experiment. unless, Dr. Karp gives sufficient evidences about the number of respondents, his assumption seems groundless.
Thirdly, Dr. Karp asssumes that the findings of the child-rearing of Tertia can be used to evaluate the other island cultures. Perhaps, the situation of other the beach might be the same instances, which was concluded by Dr. Field. Dr. Karp Unfairly assumes the condition of Tertia and nearby island cultures. Child- rearing cultures and tradition varies from place to place, and mother to mather
In conclusion, the assumption provided by the Dr. Karp seems baseless. For bolster his conclusion, he was better suggested to give the evidences regarding the past years, that is near about-20 years scenario of Tertia, the total number of respondent studied During the field experiment and evidences regarding. how the condition if child-rearing tradition of Tertal was similar or better evaluate the other island culture. unless, Dr. Karp provides evidences in these mentioned facts, his assumption seems baseless
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 324 350
No. of Characters: 1706 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.243 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.265 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.638 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 75 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.845 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.373 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.654 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.189 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist concede the the research conducted by Dr. Field--20 yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist concede the the research conducted by Dr. Field--20 yea...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...ts was far accurate. For this claim, he have survey in the islands of Tertai and ref...
^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'surveyed'.
Suggestion: surveyed
...s far accurate. For this claim, he have survey in the islands of Tertai and refuted Th...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...uggested to study the previous and past years scenario and could make better conclusi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unless
...ects the reliability of the experiment. unless, Dr. Karp gives sufficient evidences ab...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 312, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...eld experiment and evidences regarding. how the condition if child-rearing traditio...
^^^
Line 11, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unless
...tter evaluate the other island culture. unless, Dr. Karp provides evidences in these m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 323.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45820433437 5.12650576532 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7429816403 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50773993808 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2195781725 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.1875 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292346951568 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946223589199 0.0743258471296 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814154307396 0.0701772020484 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161982131736 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117379618014 0.0628817314937 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.