The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
While the letter holds a reasonable demand from the professor, there are a couple of things that are left uncertain, like the year of establishment of both the universities, rankings of the universities and other factors.
If Oceania University was a long established university and Seatown University is a recently established one then the latter may not have many professors with college-aged children, so this young population of professors may not be interested in long term benefits such as free college tuition for kids. Moreover, this factor could be discouraging for staff with no children or younger children who have to go a long way before joining college. Hence, this becomes a very specific type of benefit, rather the university should come up with a more general plan to retain all kinds of professors.
And if the former is a relatively top university, most students prefer to join that college, hence college specific tuition redemption may not be used to entice professors.
The base income and other benefits of the professors also matters because if Oceania University provides more benefits as compared to the Seatown University, then free tuition may not be the sole reason for the retention of the professors.
Hence, although it seems to be a valid request, there are lot of factors that needed to be considered before coming to a conclusion in order to retain the professors in a college.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion redemption may not be used to entice professors. The base income and othe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 2260.96107784 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 234.0 441.139720559 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09401709402 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.56307096286 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94090380451 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 204.123752495 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 705.55239521 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.8473053892 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3716274086 57.8364921388 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.285714286 119.503703932 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4285714286 23.324526521 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187951660234 0.218282227539 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866795747882 0.0743258471296 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706385217116 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100971669262 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644911275254 0.0628817314937 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 14.3799401198 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.3550499002 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.197005988 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 98.500998004 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 12.3882235529 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.1389221557 136% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.