In any long running business it is indispensable to plan with foresight for possible upcoming circumstances to avoid loss. Having that in mind, evaluating the presented argument reveals several loop holes.
At first, the writer boldly assumes that the mentioned surveys must necessarily be reliable but were those surveys taken exclusively from client of the mentioned company? And if so, was the main concern of the report electricity consumption? Since it could have been a survey on family expenditure habits where electricity saving was at best 3 out of 30 questions.
Additionally, the writer puts too much emphasis on domestic electricity consumption, evidently assuming it is the main source of revenue for the company. However, we must be cognizant that highest amount of energy consumption is often correlated to industrial use therefore the company must first consider the ratio of domicile usage to that of industry, if for example only 20 percent of income is due to supported houses, then it is asinine to solely base the company expansion program on them. Should the industry face future growth or proliferation of plant in the vicinity occur, the company will have to sign away this opportunity to its rivals.
Even if domicile usage propagates the most revenue, the writer has simply sidelined a pertinent fact which is modern life style is metamorphosing with unprecedented celerity, so businesses must also adapt swiftly. While common household item are parsimonious in energy expenditure, their sheer number has grown exponentially firstly due to population increase and secondly through more varied options available. Many people now not only own rudimentary item such as refrigerators or dish washer but also a home gym with a treadmill or extravagant gaming system, some even mine crypto currencies therefore hasty decision making could result in extensive loss of fortune.
On the final note, the corporation must make a judicious call on the matter of its further operation scale. The outcome, whether to install more equipment or to maintain the status quo more unquestionably be granted through more pertinent and trustworthy research than the one offered by the writer.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 348 350
No. of Characters: 1817 1500
No. of Different Words: 229 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.319 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.221 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.908 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 142 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.898 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.462 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.309 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.309 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the report electricity consumption? Since it could have been a survey on family e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olely base the company expansion program on them. Should the industry face future...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.6327345309 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 28.8173652695 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 2260.96107784 82% => OK
No of words: 348.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33045977011 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96304778898 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672413793103 0.468620217663 143% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.9606236837 57.8364921388 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.692307692 119.503703932 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 5.70786347227 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118435432135 0.218282227539 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356985415158 0.0743258471296 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029479482656 0.0701772020484 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0554203038791 0.128457276422 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396873959777 0.0628817314937 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.3799401198 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.5979740519 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32208582834 125% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 98.500998004 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.