The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fits and cholesterol and today low fat products abound in many food sto

Essay topics:

The following appeared in a newsletter offering advice to investors.

"Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce their intake of foods containing fits and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in many food stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old Dairy Industries are high in fat and cholesterol, the company's sales are likely to diminish greatly and company profits will no doubt decrease. We therefore advise Old Dairy stockholders to sell their shares, and other investors not to purchase stock in this company."

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the advice and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the advice.

The poll's findings can't be believed since people's wishes are frequently uncontrollable. People's actions speak louder than their words. The proportion of people who avoid fats and cholesterol will affect the Old Dairy's future. The geographical origin and average age of people with such beliefs are also unknown. The study may have been performed in a place with low demand for Old Dairy, or it may represent the beliefs of the roughly half of Americans who are obese or have heart disease. The Old Dairy's latest sales and profit figures are useful.

This would be nonsensical if they were modifying. After establishing the decision's purpose, it's regarded relevant. This sector's impact must be evaluated. Unless 20% of your target market has no plans to cut down on fattening meals, people probably won't lose money.

Is it possible that Old Diary Industries' sales may fall if the general public opts to orally consume more salubrious? Consumers' expressed predilections may not obligatorily correspond to their authentic purchase habits. Consumers' desire for more salubrious foods, yet perpetual consumption of high-fat repasts, will have little effect on a company's bottom line.

Would the company still be remuneratively lucrative if demand for its high-fat, high-cholesterol goods fell? First, it is obscure if these are the company's sole potentially jeopardous assets. Even if people's diets shift, the corporation may still earn an abundance of mazuma from its other items that inspirit a salubrious diet. Second, there's no logical reason why the corporation shouldn't be able to engender hits. Now that its denomination is more well-kenned, the firm may be able to compete.

The author additionally states that customers would not buy Old Dairy's products, which will abbreviate the company's revenue. Infelicitously, the author ignores the fact that high-fat foods are "currently" advertised. Since not all items are advertised, there may be just a diminutive cull of high-fat options. Since advertisements for high-fat and high-cholesterol repasts have emerged very lately, it's possible that Old Dairy promoted their goods for their health benefits over the majority of their marketing life. The author's conclusions should not be predicated on a transitory advertising campaign.

In conclusion, The exhortation in the newsletter as yare is deficient in paramount details. Nothing you verbally express may be considered earnestly until you have the aforementioned details. Do you believe that people will victual less dairy and meat? The poll reveals that respondents like low-fat and low-cholesterol diets, but they are not liable to follow through on this predilection. They may truncate, but not to the extent the author expects. The author's recommendation seems dubious. Old Dairy Industries' stock price decline could only be ephemeral. Investors need further information, in particular the replications to the questions raised above, afore selling their portions.

Votes
Average: 1.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
The polls findings cant be believed since peoples wishes are fr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ple with such beliefs are also unknown. The study may have been performed in a plac...
^^^
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ns who are obese or have heart disease. The Old Dairys latest sales and profit figu...
^^^
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Dairys the latest'.
Suggestion: Dairys the latest
...re obese or have heart disease. The Old Dairys latest sales and profit figures are useful. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... Diary Industries sales may fall if the general public opts to orally consume more salubrious?...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...hat inspirit a salubrious diet. Second, theres no logical reason why the corporation s...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...s no logical reason why the corporation shouldnt be able to engender hits. Now that its ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...t to the extent the author expects. The authors recommendation seems dubious. Old Dairy...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, then, well, in conclusion, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 2260.96107784 113% => OK
No of words: 457.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56673960613 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09025633591 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 204.123752495 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608315098468 0.468620217663 130% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9230833364 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.064516129 119.503703932 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7419354839 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77419354839 5.70786347227 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.67664670659 364% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958879337044 0.218282227539 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221575350178 0.0743258471296 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363662261355 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468488558549 0.128457276422 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347578944969 0.0628817314937 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.3550499002 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 98.500998004 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
The polls findings cant be believed since peoples wishes are fr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ple with such beliefs are also unknown. The study may have been performed in a plac...
^^^
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ns who are obese or have heart disease. The Old Dairys latest sales and profit figu...
^^^
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Dairys the latest'.
Suggestion: Dairys the latest
...re obese or have heart disease. The Old Dairys latest sales and profit figures are useful. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... Diary Industries sales may fall if the general public opts to orally consume more salubrious?...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...hat inspirit a salubrious diet. Second, theres no logical reason why the corporation s...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 383, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...s no logical reason why the corporation shouldnt be able to engender hits. Now that its ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...t to the extent the author expects. The authors recommendation seems dubious. Old Dairy...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, then, well, in conclusion, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.9520958084 154% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 55.5748502994 70% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 2260.96107784 113% => OK
No of words: 457.0 441.139720559 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56673960613 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09025633591 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 204.123752495 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608315098468 0.468620217663 130% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 705.55239521 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.76447105788 148% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 19.7664670659 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9230833364 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.064516129 119.503703932 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7419354839 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77419354839 5.70786347227 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.67664670659 364% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958879337044 0.218282227539 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221575350178 0.0743258471296 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363662261355 0.0701772020484 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468488558549 0.128457276422 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347578944969 0.0628817314937 55% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.3799401198 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.3550499002 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.5979740519 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32208582834 116% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 98.500998004 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.