The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis."In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years, whereas an increasin

In this memo, the author asserts that there are some problems regarding to working in large companies in Megapolis since those companies provide less facilities than small firms for law graduate students. The author states that in the last three years number of graduate students hired in law companies diminished by fifteen percent and first year student agree that work in small companies are beneficial since student work less hours, and also large companies suggest high salary but students never accept the job position in them. Close scrutiny of this memo reveals that these facts are unconvincing as it stands.

First of all, the decrease of 15 percent does not necessarily reflect the overall opinion toward job opportunity in the area. It is entirely possible there were some impetus position in other companies for example in hometown of student there were some unrelated job opportunities with preferable facilities which students no longer want to work in their specific field of study. There is another possible assumption toward 15 percent decrease, and that is full positions of companies which they have no vacancy in their positions, so they no longer accept graduate student.

Second, author claims that regarding to the one survey, first year student prefer to work in small companies rather than large firms since those firms provide more comfortable positions for students. This fact is not reliable since first year students have no precious experiences in large companies, pondering benefits of large companies such as, numerous experts; highly developed devices and software make a large company favorable for them. Or perhaps they did know the conditions of market and economic conditions of world which make clear the benefits of large companies.

Third, the high salary of large companies no longer attracts students to work in large companies. It is possible that companies had some difficult scopes like working in remote areas and in regions with harsh climate. Since pondering conditions assess that working with high salary is not preferable for law graduate students. Apart from that small companies may provide some other facilities like vocation, working in favorable areas and taking loans and meals to employee which is rare in large companies.

To conclude, the memo contains several doubtful assumptions which make them ambiguous to vote on. To bolster this memo the author should provide clear evidence about real conditions of small companies and the place they work in. The author should also provide some arguments about conditions of students in the survey in the time of graduation. I would need more information about other facilities in Megapolis to better assessment of this memo.