The less a person sleeps, the more money they make. This first seems unreasonable, but only if the recruiter has a large pool of executive elites to hire, the premise is unfounded.
First of all, no data guaranteeing the causal relationship won’t be reversed. That is to say, the better performing the company is, the less sleep a person needs. They could party all day long if an endless pools of fools are coming to town. No matter how negligent the executive group is, the business will stay good. Otherwise the non exclusion of miracles, that is to say, the sample size is not big enough. If either the good performing firms of the whole sample firms investigated are less than representative, the conclusion won’t be might precisely.
By simple logic, the merit of executives are not based on their personal life. As we live in a free world, hopefully, an employer should not spy into one’s bedroom. Unless there is legal pretense, hiring someone based on their personnel life is highly discriminatory. As the entire assumption cannot be present to court, as no legal pretense were given.
It won’t be relastic for a business to hire just the 6-hour-sleep work force, as the employees can simply lie about it, since the company has no jurisdiction in its executives bedroom. There won’t be a guarantee of success. All in all, sleep less and work more has been a widely promoted Protestant victure, giving enough incentives for people to lie and bragger about it.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 257 350
No. of Characters: 1186 1500
No. of Different Words: 156 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.004 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.615 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.632 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 38 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.133 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.217 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.53 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'pool'?
Suggestion: pool
... could party all day long if an endless pools of fools are coming to town. No matter ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
... group is, the business will stay good. Otherwise the non exclusion of miracles, that is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 11.1786427146 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 55.5748502994 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 2260.96107784 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 253.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94466403162 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82346266944 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616600790514 0.468620217663 132% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 705.55239521 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9923969002 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8666666667 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.70786347227 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991466382538 0.218282227539 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313468944485 0.0743258471296 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305551162107 0.0701772020484 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561705770258 0.128457276422 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170224341843 0.0628817314937 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 98.500998004 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.