The movie producer is asking more money from their studio. It is due to following reasons, the director is from advertising industry, they have some wasting issues. Assistant producers and directors are amateurish, will take more time, thus more timely wages to actors and crews. If no extra money, according to the producer, the movie will be a failure.
From the information give, the movie is having an uncertain fate. Every higher ups are novice directors and producers. 10% more money may not help at all. If the director is so wasteful, 10% won’t make any difference. Without pay structure and other cost bills, I can’t tell if it is true. At the same time, other assistants are so fresh, almost cursed to make more mistakes, 10% may not seem enough. Though there is no location/nation information, given the word “unionized,” we can safely assume it is a developed capitalist economy, where labor costs dominates production costs. Director is going to consume more, workers are demanding more, 10% is just rain drop in a wide bucket. The producer is very much being far to optimistic and conservative in terms of uncertain future.
On the opposite end, if we look at differently, the producer will take this 10% and run wild with it. If the situation is not that bad, 10% extra is something the producer can reward their own people for. Wasteful director is a good way to write a cheque away. Pay it to any special effect or scene company, friends will be happy. I think the “new” assistants will be easily manipulated by the producer, especially a producer with money.
In conclusion, no money should be give. Either it will become someone else’ bribe or throwing money down a rabbit hole.
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/movie-producer-sen…
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 295 350
No. of Characters: 1350 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.144 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.576 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.499 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 49 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.75 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.887 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.466 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'follow'?
Suggestion: follow
...e money from their studio. It is due to following reasons, the director is from advertisi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ormation, given the word 'unionized,' we can safely assume it is a developed...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, thus, i think, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 55.5748502994 45% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 293.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93174061433 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9253069219 2.78398813304 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.468620217663 129% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1460100158 57.8364921388 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.25 119.503703932 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.65 23.324526521 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95 5.70786347227 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193803080795 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057802762802 0.0743258471296 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393712922249 0.0701772020484 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111639623487 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562206417108 0.0628817314937 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 14.3799401198 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 12.3882235529 40% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.