"One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. I predict that modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside Towers complex will increase our profits even more dramatically."
Generally the percentage of water that runs waste in an open tap and specifically a shower head is huge.Therefore the reduction in the flow rate of water is very beneficial. It not only helps the Sunnyside Towers monetarily but will also them curb excess water wastage.
There are a few factors that have to be considered for the prediction to be true. A consensus on how much of water is used for various activities such as cooking, drinking, bathing and toiletry must be taken. Only this will give a clear picture of the area wherein lies the maximum water utilisation. If the maximum water utilisation is for cooking and drinking purposes, then reducing the flow rate may not have a huge impact on the profits.
Also if the pressure in the water head is very low, it may lead to dissatisfaction among the residents which might ultimately drive the management to restore or increase the water pressure.
The nature of residents and their occupancy patterns of the residents may influence the effect of changing the water pressure. If a huge proportion of residents stay at home, it might naturally drive up the water usage and the solution may not contribute much towards increasing the profits. The scenario might be totally different in the case that maximum number of residents are office goers. This would mean that a lot of them would not be home for at least 9 hours and their water requirements would be smaller considerably.
Thus providing all the above factors are analysed properly and are found to be favourable, the Sunnyside corporation would be able to mitigate wastage of water and at the same time reap huge profits on their water bills.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 286 350
No. of Characters: 1349 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.112 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.717 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.633 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.998 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.38 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.648 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.137 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... and specifically a shower head is huge.Therefore the reduction in the flow rate of water...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... and specifically a shower head is huge.Therefore the reduction in the flow rate of water...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t have a huge impact on the profits. Also if the pressure in the water head is ve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 2260.96107784 61% => OK
No of words: 285.0 441.139720559 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85614035088 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74890727891 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529824561404 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9595837381 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 23.324526521 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216594288735 0.218282227539 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856811357627 0.0743258471296 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267441497783 0.0701772020484 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127477058654 0.128457276422 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287839260251 0.0628817314937 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.3550499002 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 98.500998004 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.