"Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number of skateboard users in the plaza. There has also been a dramatic increase in the amount of litter and vandalism throughout the plaza. Thus, we recommend that the city prohibit skateboarding in Central Plaza. If skateboarding is prohibited here, we predict that business in Central Plaza will return to its previously high levels."
The author claims
However, the author has made several dubious assumptions which are needed to be addressed. This argument seems to be logically flawed in several critical aspects.
To begin with the author
However, the argument would be more convincing if the author have explicitly mentioned
Secondly,
Finally,
Thus, due to overstated assumptions the argument seems to be ill-founded. However, the argument would have been strengthened if the author would have mentioned more evidence. With such confirming evidence the argument begins to cohere. Without it the argument is bereft of critical foundation and can't be deemed persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal aspects. To begin with the author However, the argument would be more conv...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 140, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had mentioned'?
Suggestion: had mentioned
...ld have been strengthened if the author would have mentioned more evidence. With such confirming evi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 298, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt is bereft of critical foundation and cant be deemed persuasive.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, then, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 11.1786427146 9% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 28.8173652695 7% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 55.5748502994 20% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 565.0 2260.96107784 25% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 97.0 441.139720559 22% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82474226804 5.12650576532 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.13828899271 4.56307096286 69% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84285710852 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 56.0 204.123752495 27% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.468620217663 123% => OK
syllable_count: 169.2 705.55239521 24% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 19.7664670659 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7483225708 57.8364921388 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1666666667 119.503703932 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.70786347227 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.20758483034 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0132824744853 0.218282227539 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00638504587637 0.0743258471296 9% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00920042618734 0.0701772020484 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00599437141638 0.128457276422 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103825558526 0.0628817314937 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.3799401198 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 12.5979740519 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 98.500998004 28% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.