A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
In the argument stated by the author it is mentioned that the value of the pet food is nearly 4 million pounds which is obviously a big reason to concern. One can think that if the market investment of a company is such a huge amount then what about the reputation of the organisation. Definitely its not so easy to create a market in a competitive environment where there are verities of ways to make money and verities of companies to make money.
Its a quite common thing to understand that pet food industry is not at all a monopoly of a single business giant. It does not matter how powerful the juggernaut is, what matters is the good will created with a constant effort of so many years. Its quite easy to demote the business trend by just a small leak.
The news of illness of pets by the use of products of the company is sufficient to create a misconception in the mind of normal public. This may results into deep slashes in the stake value. It is quite difficult to create a new market. But to create a good trend of customer is more harder than it.
The statement in the passage mentioning about authentic use of chemicals allowed by the sanctioning authority proves that its not a matter of faulty production. Its may be a rumor created by a rivalry competitor to decrease the sell. Though there is no certain evidence against it but from the observations in recent past we may not ignore it. Whether it is the case of banning Haldiram, a popular brand among the lovers of sweets in US or it may be the case of Maggi, a noodles brand by Nestle, it is the social and baseless rumor that created a deep fall in the revenue of these globally reckoned organisations.
Keeping in mind these situations and taking a lessons from them it is quite mandatory to rethink against the decision of the company not to proceed the investigation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...utation of the organisation. Definitely its not so easy to create a market in a com...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...erities of companies to make money. Its a quite common thing to understand that...
^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...t to create a good trend of customer is more harder than it. The statement in the passag...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lesson' or simply 'lessons'?
Suggestion: a lesson; lessons
...ing in mind these situations and taking a lessons from them it is quite mandatory to reth...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235294117647 0.25644967241 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.128851540616 0.15541462614 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0896358543417 0.0836205057962 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047619047619 0.0520304965353 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047619047619 0.0272364105082 175% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.148459383754 0.125424944231 118% => OK
Participles: 0.03081232493 0.0416121511921 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66665882525 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0336134453782 0.026700313972 126% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.148459383754 0.113004496875 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0168067226891 0.0255425247493 66% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0168067226891 0.0127820249294 131% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1854.0 2731.13054187 68% => OK
No of words: 338.0 446.07635468 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48520710059 6.12365571057 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322485207101 0.378187486979 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.221893491124 0.287650121315 77% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.136094674556 0.208842608468 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0828402366864 0.135150697306 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66665882525 2.79052419416 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 207.018472906 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.469332199767 111% => OK
Word variations: 54.8211344176 52.1807786196 105% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5333333333 23.2022227129 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5855890567 57.7814097925 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 141.986410481 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 23.2022227129 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.724660767414 46% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 44.7226824458 51.9672348444 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.85 1.8405768891 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407914461417 0.441005458295 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102722486361 0.135418324435 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0679352995876 0.0829849096947 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.586976309144 0.58762219726 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.17973836782 0.147661913831 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170222480887 0.193483328276 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105411354271 0.0970749176394 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.417376360239 0.42659136922 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0601624210828 0.0774707102158 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282306374388 0.312017818177 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541471765467 0.0698173142475 78% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.82512315271 21% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.