Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, the population should not return to the levels before the fishing boats arrived. Because this trend is expected to continue over the next several years, the Madagascan shrimp will quickly become an endangered species.
As per argument presented, Madagascan shrimp population has shown significent reduction and number of shrimps will increase in breeding season. this population should return to the levels after the fishing boats arrived, because it can endanger this species. This arugement is rife with assumptions. It is surmised that the recursions by deep-sea fisherman have led significant reduction in shrimp population. But no information provided to support this assumption. Another assumption is that breeding season will increase this number, without any specific data.
Argument doesn't provide any specific data about to steady decrease in the number of shrimps. Is it happen this year by incrusion of deep-sea fisherman, or is there any data to compare previous years trend. The decrease in all types of shrimps or it is in some particuler types, that are more famous. This infomation is required to understand to reduction, before reaching to the conclusion.
Another assumption is about breeding season, that it can make up with decreasing number, and it is coming soon. There is a possibility that, this happens every year, shrimps number reduce and then move up in breeding season, population increase is enough that even if fishing boats arrive at that time. If it is possible then it can weaken the argument.
There is no estimate provided about how many years it will take this trend to endanger species. All this infomation is required to before reaching to the conclusion and study needs to be conducted to understand previous years trend, to understand, increase and decrease in shirmp population before and after breeding season.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...rimps will increase in breeding season. this population should return to the levels ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this number, without any specific data. Argument doesnt provide any specific dat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ithout any specific data. Argument doesnt provide any specific data about to stea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, before reaching to the conclusion. Another assumption is about breeding sea...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n if fishing boats arrive at that time. If it is possible then it can weaken the a...
^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssible then it can weaken the argument. There is no estimate provided about how ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249134948097 0.25644967241 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.193771626298 0.15541462614 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0553633217993 0.0836205057962 66% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0207612456747 0.0520304965353 40% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0311418685121 0.0272364105082 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121107266436 0.125424944231 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0553633217993 0.0416121511921 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77081171716 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0449826989619 0.026700313972 168% => OK
Particles: 0.00692041522491 0.001811407834 382% => OK
Determiners: 0.103806228374 0.113004496875 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0242214532872 0.0255425247493 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00692041522491 0.0127820249294 54% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1652.0 2731.13054187 60% => OK
No of words: 261.0 446.07635468 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32950191571 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.57801047555 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.432950191571 0.378187486979 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.340996168582 0.287650121315 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.264367816092 0.208842608468 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130268199234 0.135150697306 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77081171716 2.79052419416 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 207.018472906 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509578544061 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 48.6580561423 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.039408867 75% => OK
Sentence length: 17.4 23.2022227129 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3424818928 57.7814097925 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.133333333 141.986410481 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 23.2022227129 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.266666666667 0.724660767414 37% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 51.4996168582 51.9672348444 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.7323943662 1.8405768891 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339557224799 0.441005458295 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114428257101 0.135418324435 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0860384230866 0.0829849096947 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.531517233299 0.58762219726 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142423721616 0.147661913831 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144064928845 0.193483328276 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932047085501 0.0970749176394 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.272518304705 0.42659136922 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0825916432552 0.0774707102158 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241628720664 0.312017818177 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101734913985 0.0698173142475 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 6.46551724138 93% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 14.657635468 55% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.