SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov

Essay topics:

SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreover, Middlesburg is a predominately urban area and according to an employee survey, SuperCorp has determined that its workers prefer to live in an area that is not urban. Finally, Corporateville has lower taxes than Middlesburg, making it not only a safer place to work but also a cheaper one. Therefore, Supercorp clearly made the best decision.

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

There are several discripencies in the logic that has lead to these conclusion that Corpotateville is a cheaper and safe place. The company should have rationalised the argument more closely before reaching to the conclusion.

Clearly, the conclusion that Corporateville is safer place is not backed with enough information. Possibly the employee's choice of a non-urban area make them believe that non-urban areas are unsafe. Frist of all the workers prefence is unclear as they don't clearly state how many workers said so. There can be workers who can think that Middlesburg is a better palce to stay in. So it is necessary to know what percent of the workers really wanted to move to Corporateville. Then it is unclear how informed are the workers themselves to compare the two places. If proper information was not taken this can anger the employee and they may opt for a different company for these place being difficult to live in.

Moreover, their is no indication how they reached the conclusion that Corporatecille is a safer place. Did they look into the crime records? So a comparative study of the crime record take reveal some data about which is a safer place. Moreover, if safety is meant by availbility of hospitals proper mode of communication then nothing has been told to campare the two cities. Middlesburg being an urban area may provide for all the important amenities like hospital, school and banks in a nearby locations. Moreover,may be there are places for amusement nearby while moving to Corporateville will make access to all these amenities and places of amusement difficult.

The argument conclude that Corporateville is a cheaper place just based on the fact that the taxes are low. The place is cheap or not depends on other factors such as good road, communication, public services, availbility of cheap market area. The Corporateville may have no cheap market are and may be everything has to be obtained from far away place or from shopping malls, or may be it has no public traspport as was present in Middlesburg thus raising the daily cost of living. Data on things which affect everyday life are required to understand if the place is cheap or not. If low tax means lower corporate tax, then also then its imporatnt to see if the delivery of product and obtaining of raw material and other resources does not trump the saving made from low taxes.

The arguments has been reached abruptly and certain claims have been made without takaing a closer look into the possiblities and fallout of these decision. The rise in the cost of living can ultimately turn unprofitable for the company when the employees starts to resign.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this conclusion' or 'these conclusions'?
Suggestion: this conclusion; these conclusions
...ripencies in the logic that has lead to these conclusion that Corpotateville is a cheaper and sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the workers prefence is unclear as they dont clearly state how many workers said so....
^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...eing difficult to live in. Moreover, their is no indication how they reached the c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'location'?
Suggestion: location
... hospital, school and banks in a nearby locations. Moreover,may be there are places for a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , may
...nd banks in a nearby locations. Moreover,may be there are places for amusement nearb...
^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'concludes'.
Suggestion: concludes
...of amusement difficult. The argument conclude that Corporateville is a cheaper place ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 245, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ices, availbility of cheap market area. The Corporateville may have no cheap market...
^^^
Line 7, column 297, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...eville may have no cheap market are and may be everything has to be obtained from far ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 381, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...r away place or from shopping malls, or may be it has no public traspport as was prese...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...made from low taxes. The arguments has been reached abruptly and certain claim...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, then, thus, while, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.6327345309 168% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2224.0 2260.96107784 98% => OK
No of words: 451.0 441.139720559 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93126385809 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81887692681 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521064301552 0.468620217663 111% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6172296249 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.090909091 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.70786347227 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106338627248 0.218282227539 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316861966351 0.0743258471296 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03325274352 0.0701772020484 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0522218140449 0.128457276422 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276174553043 0.0628817314937 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 98.500998004 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 453 350
No. of Characters: 2175 1500
No. of Different Words: 227 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.613 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.801 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.758 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 142 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.591 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.602 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.682 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.274 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5