Techno corporation is our top pick for the investment this term We urge all our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed a stellite technology has been approvd by the FTA to compete with current sa

Essay topics:

Techno corporation is our top pick for the investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed a stellite technology has been approvd by the FTA to compete with current satellite provider. The company is techno corporation. A consumer survey last year indicated that over eighty percent of the respondents were dissatisfied with the current satellite television provider and would want to switch to another provider if the industry were not monopoly.Thus , the new venture of technocorporation into satellite televsion will prove to be highly profitable for those who invest now.

As stated in the article from the news letter, it will e profitable to investers if they invest now in the Techcorporation. This claim as been made bacause the Techcorporation has been approved by the FTA to compete against the current satalite television provider and also because the customers were dissatisfied by the current satallite television provider as per a customer survey. Before maiking any decisions, Techcorporation should answer the following questions.
First of all, was the survey conducted with people who actually use the satellite television. Only those using a satellite should be bound to answer questions related to the topic. There could be a possibility that this survey was conducted randamly on a busy road where people going to work to earn their living and out of hast just gave arbitrary answer. Then this survey does not hold any value. There could also be a possibilty that this survey was carried out with people who live in places where the satellite does not work properly due to various reasons. Places that are prone to thundering and lightening can damage the satellite from time to time and hence needs replacement or repair, which coudl automatically lead to a bad experience. And hence the survey resulted with the dissatisfaction of customers towards the current provider.This could lead to a risk from the investers side because the survey is not legit.If any of the above are true then the assertion is weakened.
Secondly, how much of a sureity the Techcorporation can give pertaining to the issues faced by the current satellite consumers? There could be the likelihood that the issue that people face now could be faced agin after swtiching to the new television provider. Does the article talk anything about the advancement in technology or addition of new features ? If the same features are being used by this corporation as well then there is no need for a new provider. This corporation being a new one does not have any experience to deal with the problems that the current one has faced. There coudl also be a possibility that the current satellite provider has leant from all the past experiences and has improved with time. This would mean that investing in a new firm would be disadvantageous. If the firm is able to answer any of the above questions then, the prompt could be taken into consideration.
Finally, with the satellite being replaced by cabels over the years, there could be a high probability that the people would now prefer to go with a cabel television provider than a satellite ones. This could be good in many ways, for example, wires are burried deep down the earth or hung at high heights and have no disastrous effects due to rains or thundering. They are also more fast and accurate than the satellite ones. Hence the people of the city or country would now prefer a cabel television. IF the above hold water, then the argument stands enfeeble. That being said, if the firm provides a detailed study and a more authentic information about Techcorporation , then investing for it could be taken into consideration.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 846, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... customers towards the current provider.This could lead to a risk from the investers...
^^^^
Line 2, column 928, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...rs side because the survey is not legit.If any of the above are true then the asse...
^^
Line 2, column 928, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rs side because the survey is not legit.If any of the above are true then the asse...
^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as well 'as'".
Suggestion: as
... being used by this corporation as well then there is no need for a new provider. Th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 679, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...tellite provider has leant from all the past experiences and has improved with time. This would ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...t and accurate than the satellite ones. Hence the people of the city or country would...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 673, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hentic information about Techcorporation , then investing for it could be taken in...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.6327345309 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 2260.96107784 114% => OK
No of words: 523.0 441.139720559 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92351816444 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86457066231 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 204.123752495 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455066921606 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 705.55239521 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5644645634 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.291666667 119.503703932 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7916666667 23.324526521 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.67664670659 278% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164255080428 0.218282227539 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525932367662 0.0743258471296 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446297829341 0.0701772020484 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111824906992 0.128457276422 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350300356345 0.0628817314937 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 98.500998004 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 19 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 525 350
No. of Characters: 2530 1500
No. of Different Words: 235 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.787 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.819 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.762 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 119 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 93 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 65 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.364 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.708 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.292 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.067 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5