The author here presents some reasons as to why the Pealean baskets would not be actually just 'Palean'because other villages could have made it too, however, the arguments are flawed and there are several reasons as to why this is so.
Since the woven basket has a distinctive feature which is unique it is quite surprising that it would end up on the other side of the river where paleans could not have gone to. But it is not evident enough to say that this basket is not unique to the paleans. Because first of all the author says that no boats have been found, but it does imply that no boats will ever be found. It might be that boats are long gone and in the earlier days the boats were present and the Paleans did indeed travel across the river from time to time. Also what if the river wasn't even there in the first place? What if in earlier times the whole land was just one and paleans also lived on the so-called other side of the river, that eventually got separated slowly due to the formation of the river as the water source from somewhere else opened up and obviously it had to go somewhere. Hence the river got created and now it baffles us how they could cross when in fact they could have just walked all over the place before the river came into existence.
There is also the possibility that the river might have dried up during draughts which would allow the paleans to go across to the other land and spread their civilization to other areas like that. Who knows? No one knows. But there are so many possibilities that just reduces the likelihood of the thought of assumption that paleans could never have crossed the river to send them the prominent woven basket with their unique little pattern.
And not to forget they could have taken the long route. They could have gone from behind all the way until from another place they could cross the river then they could have returned to the other side giving the illusion that they might have crossed the river with a boat, when in fact they didn't need any boat. And even if they did use a boat, then much better. Maybe their boats got washed up someday during heavy rain or some other catastrophic water event, who knows again? No one.
So the evidence of their boat not being found intimates a weak possibility that they themselves did not send their baskets on the other side. We also see the specifics about the distinctive feature , what if the unique feature is actually a logo that earlier people used and were known to many people and not just paleans? In that case, the basket might not be unique to them afterall.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 480 350
No. of Characters: 2083 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.681 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.34 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.005 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 99 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.653 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.309 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... several reasons as to why this is so. Since the woven basket has a distinctive...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...veral reasons as to why this is so. Since the woven basket has a distinctive feat...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...el across the river from time to time. Also what if the river wasnt even there in t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 315, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...m time to time. Also what if the river wasnt even there in the first place? What if ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... and obviously it had to go somewhere. Hence the river got created and now it baffle...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...before the river came into existence. There is also the possibility that the r...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sket with their unique little pattern. And not to forget they could have taken ...
^^^
Line 11, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he river with a boat, when in fact they didnt need any boat. And even if they did use...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...water event, who knows again? No one. So the evidence of their boat not being ...
^^^
Line 13, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... specifics about the distinctive feature , what if the unique feature is actually ...
^^
Line 13, column 377, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
... the basket might not be unique to them afterall.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, as to, in fact, first of all, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 13.6137724551 154% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 477.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48637316562 5.12650576532 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.07208886966 2.78398813304 74% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446540880503 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1030450105 57.8364921388 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.324526521 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.70786347227 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 5.15768463074 174% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 5.25449101796 209% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143078185691 0.218282227539 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454593130988 0.0743258471296 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427422511318 0.0701772020484 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756129019988 0.128457276422 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228677967675 0.0628817314937 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 12.5979740519 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.32208582834 84% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.