Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa

Essay topics:

Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.

The first statement provides a very impractical conclusion based on founding locality of a distinctive design patter found in Palea. It may have spread over larger geography but the evidence is obscure by the time passed or due to any catastrophic situation. Additionally, people from nearby vicinity may have learnt the design, so mentioning only Palean people utilized the design pattern is quite a myopic conclusion.

In the second statement referring to recent studies fails to mention about the weather conditions over the year passed. There could have been a chance where a drought season may occurred and the Palean people traveled across the river to Lithos and the Palean baskets might be transported therewith. A natural disaster like flood might have washed down the Palean baskets to the other bank of the river in Lithos. This kind of theories may resolve how the baskets found in Lithos without any transport facility for Paleans to cross the river. Therefore, under these circumstances the base is ill-constructed to negate the proprietary rights of the artwork discussed.

Votes
Average: 3.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, second, so, therefore, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.6327345309 25% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 13.6137724551 7% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 28.8173652695 10% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 55.5748502994 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 2260.96107784 41% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 175.0 441.139720559 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24571428571 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 4.56307096286 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78072667055 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 204.123752495 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.662857142857 0.468620217663 141% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 705.55239521 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 19.7664670659 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2216722951 57.8364921388 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.75 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 23.324526521 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.15768463074 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203693809923 0.218282227539 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761174509551 0.0743258471296 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540136498607 0.0701772020484 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152960317531 0.128457276422 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017409724765 0.0628817314937 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 98.500998004 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.