1. Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that the legislation is not effective at handling the issues in the modern society. The writer further reasons that the thought and belief by mind and heart are inflexible and the rules cannot alter them. I fundamentally do not concur with the claim and its reason. In following paragraphs, I will list my potent reasons and cast doubt over the accuracy of this disposition.
The first striking fact is the systematic base of modern society. It is obvious that the indicator factor of the modern lifestyle from the previous ones is its concise and law-centered system. Is it possible that a general denies or overlooks its origin? Furthermore, the citizens of each society obey and adapt themselves according to the dominated order. Consequently, the domain statutes will be the preference of the solution for people whenever face the problem. Actually, the underestimate of this obvious fact is analogs to the deny of the earth rotation around the sun. While the heliocentric has assented as the axiom for a long duration, laws at law-ordered modern life are the fundament that solves lots of problems.
Another crucial reason, the norm which is defined via the laws. During the history, the man-kinds’ desire for doing the devilish actions such as the killing another person for gaining the power, or making someone blind for getting revenge is verified. Therefore, there should be a base and norm which distinguish the decent action from the indecent one. Besides the morality, the law is another benchmark for making the difference between the bad and good action. At least, the rule prevents the people from doing the bad tasks for the sake of fear of punishment defined by the established rules. A lucid example which clarifies this fact is a situation in which there is acerbate interaction between two persons, this bitterness could end by even shooting each other by the gun, as the person cannot tolerate the condition. In this case, the panic from the punishment of killing someone, or even the ban of possessing the gun halt this disaster ending. Thus, the laws actually prevent the possibility of the erring by the men.
Finally, the writer reasons that the heart and brain are constant over the variation; so, laws are futile for changing their attitude. Simply the author underweights the fact of the mutation which the man-kind experiences during his life. Based on the scientific and psychological observation, a person faces various cycles of variation over his life cycles. These variations occur in both dimensions of the physical and mental. The change of belief of heart and thought of brain occurs by the mental alteration. This transformation occurs based on the trend ideology of that day which mostly shapes based on the domain laws. According to this logic, this could extract that the laws, defines the thought and belief of people.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments lead us to the conclusion the adduced claim and reason is misleading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...mate of this obvious fact is analogs to the deny of the earth rotation around the sun. W...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acerbated'.
Suggestion: acerbated
...s fact is a situation in which there is acerbate interaction between two persons, this b...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.046277666 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72947248379 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525150905433 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 16.0 4.99550561798 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0584382613 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4074074074 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209753785454 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523920757591 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422304316156 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111190223587 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313425847588 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.