In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Who is regarded as a hero? Is it someone who garners widespread fame and praise due to his extraordinary achievements? Or is it some ordinary person going on through his day to day life but also goes out of his way to help others in need? Or is it someone else altogether? I consider all of these people as heroes in their own ways and look up to the qualities that make them heroes. The topic states that it is no longer possible to regard any person as a hero anymore due to intensive media coverage. By popular opinion society usually considers people with scintillating popularity as heroes. For these kind of heroes, I agree that the topic holds true while for others it doesn't.
Many famous people are considered heroes due to their extraordinary achievements or a job with extensive societal coverage or just for the sake of being related to other popular or heroic people. These people are extensively targeted by media as people vicariously want to follow their life. Due to this, many of the day to day activities are brought out into the picture causing people to judge them by other means than what made them a hero. These considerations might affect their views of them which wouldn't have happened in the past. Best example for this would be the legendary golf player, Tiger Woods. People crazily used to flock to his matches, fawned over him and revered him due to his incredible achievements in the sport. But when his scandals and affairs were brought out into the open, people suddenly stopped respecting him and considering him a hero.
In the other case, regular people who go through tribulations to help or support others are less widely known heroes. These heroes are known well to smaller group of people i.e. his friends and family who he would have assisted. These people revere their heroes more stubbornly and are less quickly to judge them as their own lives were affected positively. These heroes are not usually exposed to the media coverage and hence their image is not tarnished.
All in all, the societies consideration of people as heroes is dependent on the mindset of a society itself. Because both the positive and negative thoughts which make or break the heroes originate from the society. If a person exists who expertly manages to slide himself into position accurately between these 2 thoughts, will never be tarnished through media coverage. Sachin Tendulkar, a cricket player from India is a great example of this. His achievements in the sport made people respect him. And his calm demeanour and peaceful presence both on and off the field persevered his image as a hero.
Thus, by view of above points, I must say that the issue holds true only a subset of categories of heroes and not in all the cases. I also feel that people should not be disregarded as heroes once their image is tarnished by media coverage. We should always take the positive aspects of each and every person and use it for our own betterment and also use their mistakes as a lesson. By teaching us a lesson through their mistakes, they continue to be heroes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 595, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...scinitillating popularity as heroes For these kind of heroes I agree that the topic holds ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 670, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...he topic holds true while for others it doesnt Many famous people are considered he...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... might affect their views of them which wouldnt have happened in the past Best example ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quickly to judge them as their own lives were affected positively These heroes ar...
^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and hence their image is not tarnished All in all the societies consideration o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
...age is not tarnished All in all the societies consideration of people as heroes is de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...field persevered his image as a hero Thus by view of above points I must say that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2508.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66171003717 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48980453075 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453531598513 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 538.0 23.0359550562 2335% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2508.0 118.986275619 2108% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 538.0 23.4991977007 2289% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 58.0 5.21951772744 1111% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158563596661 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158563596661 0.0831039109588 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998245647136 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431930223742 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 269.5 14.1392134831 1906% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -466.13 48.8420337079 -954% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 211.9 12.1743820225 1741% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.23 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 33.23 8.38706741573 396% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.8971910112 462% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 217.2 11.2143820225 1937% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.7820224719 467% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.