All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children’s schools.
No one can gainsay that effective education system will help the quality of teaching and generation of competent future-generation. In this respect, some people are in the position that parents' volunteering will not be adventurous for structuring a good quality of class, due to several relevant issues. However, not everyone agrees on such position. There are certainly cases that parents that volunteer for the class for their kids will benefit children as well as teachers.
First and foremost, some people argue that volunteering of partents would only result in distraction and lack of independence in children. This is mainly due to the fact that kids will try to talk with and come near to their children during the class, and this is much more severe when they are entangled with problems. Parents would try to help to solve the challenges assigned during the class, which will make more children diverted from the lecture and tasks given to them. In addition, this can also discourage students to develop a sense of independence. Their parents will always be their robust helper to clean the mess that they make or teach how to solve complicated math questions; therefore, kids would not be able to improve their own skills and independence. Likewise, the existence of parents would only lead to a distraction of their kid’s lecture as well as lack of independence.
However, what was alluded to above should not be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside those negative sides, there are surely positive impacts from parents’ volunteering. First of all, parents can be a good role model. Children can see how a grown adult behaves; their politeness, carefulness, appropriate uses of good word and other socially proper behaviors etc. This can cause children to mimic their good deeds and develop kindness, courtesy, and other social behavior. Furthermore, the existence of parents can be beneficial for the safety of children. They will be always watchful of potential accidents, injuries during the class or outdoor activities in a playground. As seen from those examples, parents can be important assets for school regarding their impacts as a good role model and students’ security.
Moreover, parents can help teachers’ work and reduce the teachers’ burden to care for all students. For instance, teachers may not be able to control and help all students during arts class, but parents beside teachers would promptly give scissors or glues to each student that need them. Also, when teacher needs to guide them in a field class, and parents can also follow them, and help the students outside of teachers’ care to keep up with the field trip. Therefore, parents are also great company to teachers in order to decrease the pressure on the teachers to care for students.
To sum up, there is no denying the fact that parent’s volunteering can cause distraction to children but also reduce the independency in children. However, there are also various advantages of parent’s presence in a class, such as being a good role model for good behavior and watchman for student’s safety as well as teacher’s helper. Therefore, we should encourage more parents to volunteer in the school for their kids and influence school education positively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, likewise, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2783.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23120300752 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95208487427 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449248120301 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 840.6 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9700546893 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.32 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.28 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334852576414 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110158395467 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644443608232 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211951857961 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715362137106 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.