It is primarily through our social identification with social group that we define ourselves.

Essay topics:

It is primarily through our social identification with social group that we define ourselves.

No one gainsays that human beings are conscious of their minds and endeavor to establish their self-identity. Indisputably, some individuals contend that we often base our self-identification on our innate personality and behavior or how much we accomplish in our life. Nevertheless, not everyone agrees with such idea. In some cases, people end to evaluate themselves in the context of group and interactions with others.

First and foremost, there are some cases that people rely on individual characteristics to find their self-identity. To be specific, people often define themselves according to their inherent attributes such as personality or long-standing behavior. Deving into this issue further, one who are lazy and easily feel lethargic may be able to consider him or herself as an typical case of indolent person, while an diligent one think themselves as an efficient workers. The same thing can be applied to the ones who are generous, sarcastic, or stingy etc. Similarly, people also classify themselves by the accomplishments and acheivements that they have made in their lives. To put it differently, people who have a good job think themselves an successful case, whereas those who do not may devalue their value. Based on these examples, people value themselves differently according to what they are and what they achieve.

However, what alluded to above cannot be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with those spects, there are certainly parts that other agent plays a great role in establishing one’s identity. Group is a highly consequential factor to form someone’s identity. That is because humans interact with one another in a group and come to realise who they are and what they have to do. For example, if a girl often hears that she is pretty, she comes to understand what criteria for beauty exists in a social context and whether she belong to the group of people what have a good appearance, which otherwise she would not have realized herself. In addition, people also follow social norms like customs, culture, and tradition of a group that they belong to. To elucidate this issue further, in a Asian country, bowing is a common practice that people greet each other, and respecting the elders are social code, while more egalitarian lifestyle is so in a western culture. Likewise, Asian people will be more likely to develop the behavior to follow the Asian cultural rule, as they learn to conform to the culture. Therefore, it can be concluded that people learn about themselves and lifestyles as well from the group that they are in.
Moreover, group can form the sense of belonging in people. For example, we generally belong to a nation, and it can give us sense of beloining. With this, in the historical context, we define enemies and go for a war. When we win, we feel happy and relic the victory with others in the same group. The sense of belonging, therefore, renders us the chance to understand where we should be for and what we should do to feel happy with our community.

To sum up, based on discussion above, there is no denying the fact that people can build up their self-identity from their innate attrbutes such as personality, behavior, or the life acheivements that they have completed. However, there are obviously other contributing factors such as group to establishe someone’s identity, because it suggests the criteria of how they are evaluated in a society, but also people tend to acclimatize themselves to the social norms and common practices, which can contribute to their behavior and their sense of belonging.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...y be able to consider him or herself as an typical case of indolent person, while ...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... typical case of indolent person, while an diligent one think themselves as an eff...
^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'worker'?
Suggestion: worker
...nt one think themselves as an efficient workers. The same thing can be applied to the o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 740, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...le who have a good job think themselves an successful case, whereas those who do n...
^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'belongs'.
Suggestion: belongs
...sts in a social context and whether she belong to the group of people what have a good...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 803, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...to. To elucidate this issue further, in a Asian country, bowing is a common pract...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, such as, in some cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 33.0505617978 218% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3021.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 594.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08585858586 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93681225224 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94875928667 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476430976431 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 966.6 704.065955056 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2617605776 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183494363096 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549111372504 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574650426967 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115540202555 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757457715054 0.0667264976115 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 100.480337079 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.