Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
No one can gainsay that men and women generally have different characteristics in physical and phychological traits. Indisputably, some people are in the opinion that their body structure and strength are highly different, and they cannot perform the same job. However, not everyone agrees on such position. There are certain aspects that both male and female are equally smart and intelligent, and they have no different in the capacity of executing works.
First and foremost, there are some who believe that men and women are fundamentally different, and should not be allowed to share the same work. This argument is based on the reasoning that females are on average significantly weaker in strength or stamina than males, and thus men should take on physically demanding jobs, such as construction workers or long-distance driving, not allowing women to engage in those fields. Also, to them women are even deemed to have to take care of children or family business rather than attempt to work, as they have suitability to do so than men, but also somebody ought to take the role of mom. Therefore, women in their point of view, are not adequately fit in taking the jobs that men usually do, due to the strenuous physical strength.
However, what was alluded to above should not be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with such disparity, others argue that men and women share the similar traits and can engage in the same field of works. This is mainly because nowardays, in our workplace, we no longer rely on manpower or physical labor; rather we often develop intelligence, such as our congnitive skills, reasoning power, verbal communication. Women can also improve those skills and are able to perform excellent works. For example, girls in a school are found to have higher grades than boys, due to their meticulous methods of study, deligency etc. Hence, women should not be discriminized by their gender, as they have high potential to do well in the workplace.
In addition, some women can be extremely talented in the area that men often are prioritized. Those areas can be STEM: science, technology, engineering, and math. Although females are often considered less potent or gifted at those majors and deprived of job opportunities now, some women can be as smart, intelligent, and efficient as other males, or even more competent than them. For instance, Madam Qurie was an female scientist who got Novel Prizes twice but also significantly contributed to the development on radiography science. As seen in this example, we can understand that women are able to take the same role in even man-dominating fields.
To sum up, there is no denying the fact that female and male are physically different, and their capacity to work can be dependent on the discrepancy. However, we should not neglect the fact that women are as smart and intelligent as men and can be efficient work assets to this knowledge-based society. In this respect, we should aim to develop a system to educate and provide same opportunities to both men and women in order to cultivate excellent human resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 414, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...han them. For instance, Madam Qurie was an female scientist who got Novel Prizes t...
^^
Line 9, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to cultivate excellent human resources.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03868471954 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86578976765 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479690522244 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0496414956 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.409090909 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151319911752 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523673724215 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230871538444 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946170974103 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129523963007 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.