All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is true that too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. But I do not think it totally holds true that if the companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary because I believe that the companies would still need consultants even though they spent more time listening to their own employees.
Companies hire consultants from outside when the employees of their own fail or are incompatible to do a certain task. They also hire consultants when the employees belong to a different domain than the problem domain. The organisation hires from outside when they need an expert to solve the problem or to help them suggest ways to operate more efficiently.
Also, the employees of the own organisation view the problem or the company in a perspective different from the outside world. Therefore, their ways of solving the problem or their suggestions would also differ from the outside world. To get an efficient solutions or optimal suggestions, the expertise of employees of both, inside and outside the organisation should be taken into consideration. This would help the organisation operate more efficiently as they would now have diverse solutions and suggestions.
Therefore, I conclude by stating that the skills of employees of both, inside and outside the organisation are important for the efficient and overall growth of organisations or companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
... the outside world. To get an efficient solutions or optimal suggestions, the expertise o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 237.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27426160338 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00853054346 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 215.323595506 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464135021097 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3695686943 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464368396107 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200381961986 0.0831039109588 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179663225182 0.0758088955206 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284049646507 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.239473516203 0.0667264976115 359% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 100.480337079 39% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.