Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
Cow flu is deadly and can take many lives with it. The only way, at present, to prevent the disease from infecting and spreading and taking any more lives is inoculations. Continuous administration of inoculations is necessary to prevent the spread of flu and if possible, to even eradicate the flu in the region.
It is also true that the inoculations which can save the lives of people can also be deadly sometimes. Figures have shown that certain number of deaths have caused due to the continuous administration of inoculations. But this should not prevent people from taking inoculations as the figures also show that the number of deaths caused due to the flu is far more that the deaths caused due to the inoculations.
This is because, cow flu spreads very easily from one person to another. Also, once infected, in a very short span it completely takes over the body of the patient. Cow flu is considered even more dangerous as proper medication has not yet been identified. Due to these reasons, this flu is proven as fast transmitting and dangerous.
Therefore, even though taking inoculations might seem risky, people should understand that if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected, there is a sure chance that they won't be infected and wouldn't be the carrier of the disease.
Also, new and better techniques for the prevention and curing of cow flu should be discovered to remove the minimum risk the inoculations are posing too.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 259 350
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 259 350
No. of Characters: 1234 1500
No. of Different Words: 133 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.012 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.764 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.765 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.583 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.657 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.391 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.676 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.103 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...e chance that they wont be infected and wouldnt be the carrier of the disease. Also,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 55.5748502994 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 16.3942115768 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 2260.96107784 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 257.0 441.139720559 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94163424125 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.56307096286 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85802896653 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 204.123752495 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505836575875 0.468620217663 108% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 705.55239521 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8585133105 57.8364921388 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.833333333 119.503703932 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 23.324526521 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.70786347227 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283019749098 0.218282227539 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098043710556 0.0743258471296 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885402068965 0.0701772020484 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16151080679 0.128457276422 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102846988001 0.0628817314937 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.3799401198 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 98.500998004 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.