All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The issue here is that all too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest efficient ways to hire. So, if the companies spend more time listening to their own employees, there will be no need of consultants. Some people can support consultants to hire for companies are they have more list of candidates who are applying for job which saves time for the company. But, I want am not one of them, I want to support companies to directly hire without a need of consultant. Here are my statements to support my claim.
Firstly, the company knows the best of what it takes to get a job in their firm. They are the right people to take an interview and employ a candidate for their firm. The consultants may be good at recognising the needs of the company but ultimately the cost is bared by the company if the employee turns out to be bad. For example, the tech leads like Google, TCS or Facebook have their own portals for hiring employee based on specific requirements. Google conducts an online test as part of hiring process. Similarly, TCS conducts CodeVita(online coding exam) and it is entirely different from that of Google. Hence, the consultants can understand the minimum needs for the company but cannot fully justify it.
Furthermore, not all consultants can be reliable. There can be a plausibility that the consultancy lacks expertise in hiring but just want to continue it is a profittable business. This kind of issue can cause problem to both companies and candidates. These fraud consultants can falsely show a underrated company as a top nouche and trick the candidate or can trick the company by suggesting a potentially abysmal candidate as best. By these factors under consideration it is risky for both companies and candidates to trust the consultant.
Finally, as they say "middle man always spoils the game". Candidates may find difficulty to approach a company because of so many consultants in the middle. These consultants can ask for a big chunck of money from both candidates and companies by just connecting them. These consultants are neither the cause nor the effect but just act as a catalyst and gain lots of profits. By eliminating these middle ground a candidate can directly interact with the desired firm and apply for an opening.
Conclusion, there are some potential reasons to state that consultants are useful. But those positives those not overrule the negatives like fraud, transparency. Hence, I would like to conclude saying it is better for a company to hire a candidate directly rather than going to a consultant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 294, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hese fraud consultants can falsely show a underrated company as a top nouche and ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, similarly, so, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95642201835 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88652324689 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5821055182 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.44 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.44 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434591414547 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121140194084 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104534848093 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245308633741 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124498875712 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.