All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Without employees the company is nothing in the market, the employees of the company are like the foundation of the company. The author claim that if the company spend more time listening to their employees there will be no need to hire the outside consultants for the benefit of the company. I completely agree with this statement, because employees of the company can give better and most innovative ideas for improvement of company than anyone else.
First of all, none other that employees of the company know what is better for the company. Because the employees do each and every work in comapany and they better know about each task of the company. For instance, operaters in IT company have a greater knoweledge of how to operate the systems, what connecctions are needed, what resources they need. Therefore, if these employees make their own schedule and planning for company's efficiency, they can achieve it rather that assigning this task to someone else out of the company.
Additionally, if the company takes suggestions from the employees of the company then there will be huge profit to the company. Because the companies can save lot of funds by not hiring to outside consultant. And can use this funds for company's further improvement. For instance, the saved funds can be use to hire more employees, also company can use this funds to increase their infrastructure. Thus, without hiring outside consulatant company will get more benefit.
Further, if employees get the schedule efficient to them, then they can work more efficiently. Again, the employees working with its full efficency is the indeed progress of the company. Moreover, the company can increse the salaries of his employee rather than hiring outside consultant. Also, if company listen to employees, who are lagre in number, hence can provide more innovative ideas for incresing efficiency of company.
In conclusion, the company should not hire the outside consultant for incresing effectiveness of company. Rather the company should assign this task to his own employees who knows better than the outside consultant, about what is better for company. Additionally by doing this comapny will get more profit in terms of economic gain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere will be huge profit to the company. Because the companies can save lot of funds by ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...t. For instance, the saved funds can be use to hire more employees, also company ca...
^^^
Line 9, column 304, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...t. For instance, the saved funds can be use to hire more employees, also company ca...
^^^
Line 13, column 328, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
.... Also, if company listen to employees, who are lagre in number, hence can provide more...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...for incresing effectiveness of company. Rather the company should assign this task to ...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 251, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...tant, about what is better for company. Additionally by doing this comapny will get more pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, as for, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19060773481 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7104290487 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436464088398 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5748223832 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.8947368421 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362100562297 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152014774444 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902737304494 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242383221778 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782814543206 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.