All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The speaker states that the companies should not hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate efficiently but rather should spend more time considering the suggestions of their own employees. On one hand, I agree to the speaker as this would definitely reduce the cost of company. On the other hand, the outside consultants can be more efficient as they have a broader perspective of looking at the economy than the employees who tend to work in only one domain.
On one hand, by hiring outside consultants, not only does the company spend money extravagantly on the them, but also increases the potent risk of misuse of the information about the company. Sometime, hiring consultants can even be unfruitful since the dependability on them can vary on a large scale. Moreover, one cannot guarantee fully on the consultants. Employees can be more dependable since they are bound by the law to the company. For example, there are various labs and startups which can act as consultants to a big firm and can provide various suggestions. But, since it is just a startup which cannot be guaranteed, misuse of information of the company can take place.
On the other hand, I feel that the companies should hire consultants. Consultancy firms are highly professional and provide best suggestions. They have had clients all over the world and know how to tackle tedious problems in a well defined manner. Various consultancy firms like PWC, Deloitte, EY are highly reputed consultancy firms. The consultants give valuable suggestions to the company thereby reducing the efforts of the company. Moreover, they also have good experience and are highly dependable since even they have prove their worth.
The consultancy firms are updated with the latest technology which the employees of the company might not be. Admittedly, the company will have to invest more on the employees. Instead of burdening the employees with various tasks, the company can give the same to the consultants. Also, there are chances that the suggestion provided by the employee might not be reliable. Thus, instead of taking various risks, the company should hire consultants and provide them the responsibilities.
In sum, the employees of the company can be unreliable since they have not updates themselves to the broad aspects of the economy. By hiring the consultants, the not only will the efficiency of the company increase but also the accuracy of the suggestions and the assurance of the outcome.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...who tend to work in only one domain. On one hand, by hiring outside consultants...
^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...he company spend money extravagantly on the them, but also increases the potent risk of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provide the best'.
Suggestion: provide the best
...tancy firms are highly professional and provide best suggestions. They have had clients all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
... highly dependable since even they have prove their worth. The consultancy firms ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11707317073 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86590659007 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441463414634 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.379092045 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3636363636 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68181818182 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373363977264 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119279256702 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104699945732 0.0758088955206 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234137683454 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879309427817 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.