All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
All companies usually hires some third party consultants to evaluate the perfomance of the company and suggest regrding remedies to subside the extra burden on employees or to chnage the process of work so that there will be more benefits and less human-work. Especcially for multi-national giants these thing id not just beneficial but necessary. The other opinion is that instead of calling for third party views, if they listen to their employees carefully it will be more useful. Althogh I'm strongly agree with the outside surveys to suggest changes, I'm not totally gainst the view of listening to the employees, and to proove my point I've some related facts.
All to often we all have some bias related to the rules on which employee should act and work, an dthat bias obscure our vision, we don't check other perspective. Even if we try to get the survey done by employee we just hear, we don't actually listen of try to grasp other's problem. The main reason for that I suspect is ego. Generally who is at higher authority has more experience than his team, which causes ego problems in listening the views of other person who is still a tyrop as compare to you.
In this kind of situation, the outside consultant can do real good. They are not bias as they have nothing to with the deay to day work of the company and its employees. They are straight-forward and unambiguous in views. They ask same kind of question to all of the employees and find the possible deamon. One other benefit they might cause is the asking the right questions, as there job is to find the probable cause, they have way better understanding of the problems then other authority inside the firm itself. They can directly report to the judiciary commitee, so that no alteration in between.
Although the third-party invesigators can do miraculous job, but it is not the case always. Sometimes the outsider came to the company might not have enough experience the with the domain in which the firm is operating. Suppose the person is from financiual services domain and the target company is a heathcare giant, then the person can cause a trouble. Apart from domain experties the other attributes should also be considered like physical location, imapct of local culture on company, religion, endemic rituals and etc. If the invesigator doesn't consider all of these things, he might ruin the entire effort.
In summation, Only one monotonic view towards the outsider survey or to listening to the employees many atimes does no good. but if we use bothe of them in proper proportioned to evakuate problem, then it does help the company. This can be done by many ways, all employyes should give contribution to select the proper investigator, and they should consider the employees views fiorst and then evaluate. The firm should choose investigator based on related domian experience. There should be intra-firm surveys which should evalusted by the special department of firm itself, so that it should provide benefits of both bulls, the department it self is independent from the day to day affairs of production and still they are employed by the company. Although there are multiple hinders to get actual truth behind the problems, no method single handedly sufficient to solve the problem once for all, so to get best of the result we should use mixture of that two, so that weshould atleast have confidence that it will not cause more problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
.... Especcially for multi-national giants these thing id not just beneficial but necessary. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...refully it will be more useful. Althogh Im strongly agree with the outside surveys...
^^
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...the outside surveys to suggest changes, Im not totally gainst the view of listenin...
^^
Line 1, column 641, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...o the employees, and to proove my point Ive some related facts. All to often we ...
^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... on which employee should act and work, an dthat bias obscure our vision, we dont ...
^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...k, an dthat bias obscure our vision, we dont check other perspective. Even if we try...
^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...urvey done by employee we just hear, we dont actually listen of try to grasp others ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aight-forward and unambiguous in views. They ask same kind of question to all of the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...iews. They ask same kind of question to all of the employees and find the possible deamon....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... miraculous job, but it is not the case always. Sometimes the outsider came to the com...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 518, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...e on company, religion, endemic rituals and etc. If the invesigator doesnt consider all ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 546, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...mic rituals and etc. If the invesigator doesnt consider all of these things, he might ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...the employees many atimes does no good. but if we use bothe of them in proper propo...
^^^
Line 9, column 642, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
... benefits of both bulls, the department it self is independent from the day to day affa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, still, then, third, apart from, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2860.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 586.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88054607509 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62898567055 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 876.6 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3068503248 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.44 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187017570485 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491223571109 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550964924454 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109559558245 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787899717626 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.