People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Making decisions is an essential part of life, from the very beginning of the human race we are making decisions to survive. Sometimes there is enough rational thingking on work to justify the decision taken or sometimes decisions are driven by the gut feeling. Although emotion driven decision which afterward supported or justified with logic may not seem the perfect choice, some situations are so complex that waiting for rational decision can leads to huge loss. In my opinion the decision cannot be judge by it's rationality alone, one should also consider the situation in which decision has been taken.
The first reason to believe that the emotional decisions will not always perfect to take is of Adolf Hitler. Hitler's decision about genocide of Jew race was largely driven by his hatred towards them, thus it was more of a emotional than rational decision. This hatred made him so blond that he applied very poor logic on some bettle fronts, and in result he failed to achive victory. Although some might argue that his decison was unethical so that he failed, pragmatically it was not ethics who failed him but the baseless justifications of his actions which ruined him.
More over if we continue with the World War Two further, the decison to use atomic power on Japan was also emotion driven. After failing to secure Pearl Harbor front, America could not resist the strong emotions to run over ethics. There might have been other possibilities, and killing the civilians in any war is unethical, but still the decision to launch 'Big Boy', on Hiroshima was taken. In result millions died, and even more crippled and future generations are still observing serios effects.
On the other side, some situations are relatively complex and rationality or ethics, not always give a way out. it's like a maze every way seems similar, but if we take the way driven by gut feeling, we might have a justification to going further, and that might be the only chance to survive. The survival stories of lost crew from Peru, who stuck in the ice fields of Andies and came out after three months of deadly winter, might support that, it was the hope and the strong urge to survive, which kept them alive.
In summation, it is unfair to evaluate a decision on the basis of its rationality alone, one must step in the shoes of decision maker, and after careful observation of situation, we might can judge the decision. The emotion driven decision may not always work, so that of rational ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... that waiting for rational decision can leads to huge loss. In my opinion the decisio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...atred towards them, thus it was more of a emotional than rational decision. This ...
^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...y or ethics, not always give a way out. its like a maze every way seems similar, bu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82983682984 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46018937743 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3539034278 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.882352941 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312262405534 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10848124966 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954767852545 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174474830991 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138155433852 0.0667264976115 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.