In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should be
required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your
reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position,
you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and
explain how these consequences shape your position.
The issue states the managers and adiministrators in different sections of industry and education must be restricted in their period and they should not be allowed to be in the office more than 5 years. However, looking at it from a different angle, we see the values of these seemingly overdue persons such as experience and knowledge they have gathered during the years in power. Moreover, finding a new manager is a complicated process which also creates a new work envoironment with new demands.
First, 5 years is not adequate to evaluate the quality of a manager, because it may take some time to control the situation and overcome the severities. Additionally, many person in charge of leading a company or an organization begin showing competencies and talents just after 5 years so forcing them to abandon their offices at 5 years is not recommended. In some cases it happened and unfortunately the whole system was collapsed. For example, some Iranian football clubs after a season of failures, do not let the coach stay in the team and fire him in hope of finding a better coach, but surprisingly the fired coach who has been given more time in another team, does very well and make the team champion.
Second, employees cannot soon change their long term habits. It means that they get used to the current manager and all his principles, ideas and expectations, but a new manager will not be in accordance with the staff and employees at least for the first year. This inconsistency wastes the valuable resources of the company and keeps them away from their mission. However, avoiding this ridicules rule, reduces the risks .
Finally, let’s assume that every company agreed to this rule and the administrators prepared to leave their offices before reaching the fifth year of their period, then how to find new suitable persons to fill this vacancy. It is quite time consuming and difficult to select the best candidate to head a large company, since exact and careful assessment before hiring the right person. It reveals that, this 5 year limit is not applicable to every case easily due to its infrastructural problems.
All in all, the 5 year limit for managers and administrators does not seem reasonable owing to some facts which probably ignored by the writer of the issue. The experience and knowledge collected during 5 years in office will be wasted if they are forced to leave. Moreover, the employees use resources to get familiar with the new person and at last finding a new reliable and valuable person could be leanthgy and complicated process. For these reasons, the companies have to resist this limit and keep their managers in power for more than 5 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'many people', 'many persons'.
Suggestion: many people; many persons
... overcome the severities. Additionally, many person in charge of leading a company or an or...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...g this ridicules rule, reduces the risks . Finally, let's assume that every ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, then, well, at least, for example, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2240.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89082969432 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7329797879 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543668122271 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5787693813 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0506403415405 0.243740707755 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0164408430409 0.0831039109588 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0231899251368 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0301729188063 0.150359130593 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219826057636 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.