In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The given issue in which author said that “In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field” is one of the best issue for the success of hard working in the world now. I support the fact that without hardworking in the past in the same field, it is impossible to get achievement in the present and the future.
Firstly, Achievement in the any field is output of the hardworking for a long time , no one get success if they did not do any hardworking in the past. “As” they did their best in the past in the same field they must do same labor and strongly influenced themselves by past achievements. For example, Einstein: who invented the “theory of relativity” which is one of the important theory in the science, later he did the other theory like in photoelectric effect. He must influenced himself by the past achievement that he was become a great scientist later by hardworking.
Additionally, Without any small achievement in the past no one influenced by the same field that they already frustrated about in the same field . They may choose another field for their successful life. The success is come with you if you have to effort from the heart, the small achievement in the past made you a better in the same field by the relentless working in the same field.
Furthermore, Although, someone had achievement in the past and may their interest was change later, they have also a better contribution in the new field. But they have the new idea and new career which may not successful.
At last, the field you choose for your life is depend on the past achievements within the same field that you make a significant contribution in the present and possibly a very successful in the life by hardworking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...utput of the hardworking for a long time , no one get success if they did not do a...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the past in the same field they must do same labor and strongly influenced thems...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ready frustrated about in the same field . They may choose another field for their...
^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...past made you a better in the same field by the relentless working in the same fi...
^^
Line 8, column 48, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
..., the field you choose for your life is depend on the past achievements within the sam...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83385579937 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97421820529 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413793103448 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2458976545 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464700424281 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186496388777 0.0831039109588 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14431658996 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286380706441 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166408102902 0.0667264976115 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 100.480337079 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.