In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
It has been long debated whether achievements of a new generation influenced by earlier work or the new achievements are independent of previous contributions. at a glance from our history and progression, we can say that any contribution in any field previous studies was important.
First of all, specifically, in the field of science, we can say that our modern results are directly dependent on previous research. If we assay the history of science, our progression happened in graduation. For example, Stephan Hawkins influenced by Einstein's works and Ernestine influenced by Newton's work. In the field of science, we carry the legacy of our ancestors. Without the past work, whether that was a success or failure, it contributes or gave us knowledge that we can pass forward.
Another point is that past discovery always influenced modern achievements. If our ancestors do not discover Wheel then there will be no car Thomas Savery does not discover steam engine there will be no modern day transportation. Also in the field of literature past works are mot significant and influential to modern writers. For example, modern-day mystery genre writer greatly influenced by Conan Doel and Agatha Christy, where drama writer influenced by Shakespeare. so, in every field past achievements left a significant influence.
On the other hand, very argument has an opposite side and some people argue that every work does not need to be influenced by past achievements. Picasso and Da Vinci created their art distinct from the rest and past works. Also, Mozart created his music without any earlier influence, Agatha Christy also one of the earlier iconoclastic woman detective novel writers. But I would counter that by, our society does not progress in a step by step manner where every discovery is significant and without the past experience, we may not contribute to any field.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that modern works are significantly influenced by past achievements, where on the other hand there are plenty of works which distinct from the rest and previous achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: At
... independent of previous contributions. at a glance from our history and progressi...
^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... always influenced modern achievements. If our ancestors do not discover Wheel the...
^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...drama writer influenced by Shakespeare. so, in every field past achievements left ...
^^
Line 4, column 505, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...iscovery is significant and without the past experience, we may not contribute to any field. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 341.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16715542522 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99655664768 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513196480938 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0137179374 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.647058824 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299342846277 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10194380958 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661545078614 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166017642481 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509766952358 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.