The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
The crux of the topic is that the best leader should have the characteristics of encouraging critical feedback from the people whom they led. I personally agree with the statement and I am going to provide some example to bolster my stance.
First of all, leaders are the vanguard of a group, belief or an institution. They lead a group towards the common goal and welfare of the institutions or society, and to do so, feedbacks are the most pivotal point to be considered. A great leader can not lead the people without knew their view and wary. From history, we knew that great leaders like Abraham Lincoln or Gandhi not just burden the work on the shoulder on the supporter but also they lead them and work with them. So, to know the thought trends of the people every leader should encourage critical feedback from the people.
Feedbacks are really important in every aspect of leadership skills. A leader does not only lead but also have the quality of foreseeing the situation and glued his team by his skills. From the feedback a leader might find out what went wrong or a precarious situation about a job, also a critical response the extend the view of the situation and diverse his knowledge about his team. With accepting the response the team and leader participate in common work and improve the situations. For example, in a democratic country, political leaders should allow critical feedback because criticize the situation or a policy strengthen democracy. Similarly, in company or institutions, a leader should be criticized and counter the points of his for the decisions. By doing, so the weakest points of a policy or scheme will be in vision and ability to counter the situations.
On the other hand, people might argue that it is impossible to come to rapport with everyone. The critical response might create stress and harm the overall work progress. Also, many feedback leads to confusion and bedlam situations. But, we still use the critical response by using the productive points from the feedback and sort out the important one, then we use them to improve the quality and ambiance of a workplace.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that encouraging feedback is really helpful and important to improve leadership quality. We use feedback in our favor and accept them as long as the response is on the point and not on personal criticism.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n about a job, also a critical response the extend the view of the situation and diverse h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, really, similarly, so, still, then, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81907090465 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64323646831 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466992665037 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1578855405 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.55 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322793279598 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100032991332 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102733443404 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192930622645 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101519285183 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.