TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The statement is widely debated all over the world that should we give priori to clear the fundamental concept of a subject or students just learn facts. I am agreeing with the statement.
The important question is how our exam system should be, is it should base on facts and what happens previously or should be based on understanding the main idea and concept behind the topic.
Our education system in our modern days is exam based. Students have to clear an entrance exam to enter a school or college or a course and students mugged up the subjects rather than understanding the concept, to pass the exam. Concept and idea be always priorities than facts. For example, every exam in our engineering course has mathematics and peoples usually try to remember some mathematical formula that would be useful in the exam but as soon as the exam was over they forget all the formulas and this is the bad side of memorizing some facts. In the other cases, if a student understands the idea and concept of a formula rather than just memorizing the formula, they can always remember the formula and never forget it. Education should always inspire students to free their minds and think differently and inspire them to invent new ways. If a student doesn’t understand the subject he or she can never love that and they don’t love the subjects that only harm students marks and they won't inspire to invent new things.
In the other side, some people think that, if the subject is history or some literature then there is the least thing to understand or clear the concept. For example, in history students actually memorize year of some battle or some invention or some events, there are not many things to understand. But I would say that, if students learned the behind story of an historical events or cause of that incident they could have easily memorize the facts. For some literature subjects, for example, English students learn it's etymology to understand where it's coming from or learned it's phonetics to know how the words sound like. Thus the idea or concept behind a subject is important than knowing only that facts or memorize the formula or incident. Undemanding the idea students better understand the subject. By understanding the subjects they could be passionate about those subjects and that inspire them to invent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...subject or students just learn facts. I am agreeing with the statement. The important que...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 376, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...arned the behind story of an historical events or cause of that incident they could ha...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'memorized'.
Suggestion: memorized
...of that incident they could have easily memorize the facts. For some literature subjects...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 627, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...etics to know how the words sound like. Thus the idea or concept behind a subject is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85536159601 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55177663263 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456359102244 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.433669206 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.529411765 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70588235294 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215127275876 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871915699758 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465732593677 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139506463118 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461785902675 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.