In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The argument topic emphasizes that important contribution is possible from the beginners. I disagree with this statement. I feel this way for some major reasons: experienced person can take the big venture, important contribution needs more challenging work, and qualification mainly possible from the experienced.
To begin with, crucial task needed more confident and audacious leader; that is only possible from the well known and reputed experienced person is fruitful. We can take our national problem as a compelling example of this statement. Before the 10 years ago, Nepal completely suffering from the big troubled, national war between two parties. To pacify this conflict, experienced and qualified leader Girija Prasad had been chosen. Hence, he had solved this problem carefully and wisely.
Secondly, national difficult task has been solved by the new elected leader but in fact those leaders are also from expert. No one believe the beginner: they do not have a capacity. Capacity built by the problem and situation. Audacity and capacity depend on the problem faced. If, anyone faced the several problems, he will able to solved the up-coming similar task. There is no any evidence that new beginner that can solved the problems and gives the contribution.
Finally, we can say that contribution is not easy: it takes much time and effort. Pertinacious skilled only can complete the given task easily. It is needed to take more information from the expert and choose the experienced one is favorable for major task. Entrance exam is needed for the beginner because there is guarantee he will compete the task without any doubt. For instance, before selecting the Doctor's candidate, every year educational institution takes the entrance exam since they want to check the qualification.
To recapitulate, important contribution is only possible from the experienced man rather than that of beginner. We can take the beginner to complete the simple and easy task; whereas, for difficult contribution qualified is essential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ed the up-coming similar task. There is no any evidence that new beginner that can...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36448598131 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84672481282 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554517133956 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7211938722 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101450370947 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300337789349 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386752211224 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633218354666 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263659437645 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.