In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is a common practice to refer to a beginner as not experienced enough to contribute to some work. Many superiors do not trust important projects to those newly employed because of lack of expertise of the latter. However, I strongly believe that the practice of involving beginners in projects is accompanied by more benefits than disadvantages, although it does not diminish the importance of experts.
First of all, those who are adept at some field are familiar with situations when one forgets to investigate at length issues that seem obvious to them. For instance, imagine a statistician who annually develops an index of a monthly amount of money needed for a person to survive. This statistician bases his or her calculations on the methodology that was developed long ago. Being so familiar with the methodology that he or she may not even think of how antiquated it may have become. On the other hand, a not experienced person who first sees the methodology may notice how it might contradict the reality. A beginner may contribute significantly to the improvement of the methodology such that it reflects the current conditions of people’s lives.
Secondly, beginners commonly are avid to show how hard-working they are and thus may contribute much more to the project than experts. For example, an experienced doctor who has delivered diagnoses thousands of times in his or her life may not pay a lot of attention to a patient and thus ultimately not consider some important symptoms. At the same time, a beginner who is afraid of making a mistake will treat any negligible symptom as an important one. In some situations, it may lead to the case when a beginner may deliver a more correct diagnosis compared to one of an experienced doctor.
At the same time, one should not underestimate the role of experts in any field. Although it is important to give beginners a chance to show themselves and take their opinion into account, it is obvious that those who have more expertise and experience are vital for a work to be done well. It is hard to imagine that those who want to undergo a plastic surgery will choose a surgeon with two years of experience. The more one practice in their work, the less likely they are going to make a mistake. It is like preparing for the GRE exam. A person who has not practiced at all, no matter how clever he or she is, has few chances to get a good score. Only with practice the probability of making a mistake decreases.
To sum up, I strongly support the idea that beginners are important in any sphere of our lives and from time to time their contribution may be greater than that of experts. However, while providing them with the opportunities to show themselves it is important for beginners to develop their knowledge and skills to once become an expert in their field.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2356.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77890466531 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8591988749 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480730223124 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8945709254 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.090909091 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4090909091 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150932795095 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502242916084 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336226372278 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948550994859 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330843050316 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.