Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is often claimed that limiting the period of time during which one can be in power is auspicious for development in almost all fields of life whether it is entrepreneurship, politics or any other area. I strongly support this point of view although I also believe that there must be some exceptions from this approach.
One of the reasons why it is beneficial when those who are in power leave their position after some time is that any knowledge and experience can become outdated. A good leader can simply become too old to catch up with all the changes we experience nowadays. At the same time, young leaders may be more aware of people’s needs and thus bring new experience and skills that more senior population may not possess. Thus, new leadership indeed may facilitate revitalization of a firm, a region or even a country and make them more successful.
It is also a common view that frequent change of positions is favorable for leaders themselves as this allows them to constantly upgrade their own skills. Recent policy in South Korea that forces the heads of public authorities to change the post they hold after a three-year period pursues primarily an above-mentioned goal. When a person faces new challenges all the time, it enables him or her to gain new knowledge and experience. Ultimately, a leader becomes more effective, and a broader range of skills allows him or her to pursue better career in the future.
At the same time, I think that any leader must be given a chance to be reelected. For some person, five years may seem short enough to reach a success or to bring a company or a country to a new level of development. In this case, not giving a leader an opportunity to extend the time of his or her leadership may have an opposite effect. A person may be not motivated enough to work hard as he or she will understand that the period of time is too short to make any changes. I believe this is one of the main reasons why most democratic countries allow their leaders to be reelected for the second term. This does not only allow a leader to implement longer-term programs but also motivates them to be more effective and productive in order to prolong their leadership.
Thus, while there are a lot of arguments in favor of limited period during which one can be in power, it is clear there are some advantages of enabling a person to prolong the time of his or her leadership. It allows a leader to be more motivated, on the one hand, and work more effectively and productively, on the other hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
It is often claimed that limiting the period of time during which one can be in power is aus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d as he or she will understand that the period of time is too short to make any changes. I bel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, thus, while, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2098.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62114537445 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73760103569 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477973568282 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6863130642 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121090699075 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431435525383 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418401330652 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733694734481 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275099415973 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.