In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Regarding communication we all have developed a perception that talking allows us to solve imbroglio. Similarly discussion favors a solution ,whether it is towards progress or not depends on various factors. Sometimes the circumstances cannot progress even with the discussions between counterparts. Kashmir dispute between india and pakistan being a concrete example for the same.
Communication does little to solve our problems. One of the cardinal example of this is Britain's withdrawal from EU. Currency - pound was severely affected. The Brexit incited the notion of withdrawal by caluminating the officials of EU in Austria. Although the problems in London were due to lack of local negligence but brexit incited the discussion which led to many debates between the supporters and the naysayers, Tabloids were influential enough to draw the public which has now led to difficulties for England's citizens. Therefore, discussion between contrapositive opnions can sometimes take a downhill path which stymie's the progress rather than augmenting it.
When a discussion between two counterpart is initiated. There is no guarantee that a consensus will be reached. Sometimes this discussions tends to go on, while the resources are profligated and this hinders the progress. Suppose Samsung plans to launch the so talked about foldable smartphones, the discussion between the employees is initiated regarding the lifetime of such devices, One side argues that the foldable phone won't last long due to the regular folding and unfolding mechanism , others suggest that folding phones are going to arrive in the market so they should be one to carry over the product to the market. Meanwhile the enigneers are waiting and wasting their time to support each side and the resources are being wasted. Therefore, sometimes discussion may allow progess but the amount of time the discussion lasts also becomes a key factor in determining the need of discussion and subsequently the cost of reaching the consensus.
the world of football is often similar to these discussions between the pundits with disparate opinions. Neymar - the current cynosure of footballing pundits, discussions regarding his suitability to Barcelona football club is proceeding but whether the juice may be worth the squeeze or not totally depends on the result. This is chance Barcelona must be willing to take. Therefore rather than discussions sometimes going forward with an approach can also save us time which would more viable since discussions do not always lead to consensus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...t talking allows us to solve imbroglio. Similarly discussion favors a solution ,whether i...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... Similarly discussion favors a solution ,whether it is towards progress or not de...
^^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns between counterparts. Kashmir dispute between india and pakistan being a concr...
^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Brexit incited the notion of withdrawal by caluminating the officials of EU in A...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... progress rather than augmenting it. When a discussion between two counterpart is...
^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'counterpart' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'counterparts'.
Suggestion: counterparts
...ng it. When a discussion between two counterpart is initiated. There is no guarantee tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... a consensus will be reached. Sometimes this discussions tends to go on, while the r...
^^^^
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... regular folding and unfolding mechanism , others suggest that folding phones are ...
^^
Line 5, column 627, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...o carry over the product to the market. Meanwhile the enigneers are waiting and wasting t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the cost of reaching the consensus. the world of football is often similar to t...
^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...similar to these discussions between the pundits with disparate opinions. Neymar ...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s do not always lead to consensus.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46347607053 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94278673199 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589420654912 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 88.6268018153 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.45 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.85 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120991811438 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376493782043 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381166712521 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079994041335 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026889345589 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.