In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A healthy discussion is a very effective medium for solving intrinsic problems. Discussions with a group of people with diverse mindsets might be very beneficial. The prompt suggests that progress requires discussion among people who have a contrasting opinion. I mostly, agree with this and would argue that as long as there is constructive criticism the discussion is always wholesome and beneficial for progress, once the situation hits a plateau.
To begin, Contrasting opinions or views gives you an insight into what better way a problem can be tackled in order to satisfy all the criteria. It helps find a better or a more complete solution, which might have not been addressed if not for contrasting views. For instance, working in a corporate world would require you to come up with the best possible solutions for a given problem. When a company is designing an app and once the team feels complacent and discusses with people for feedback and they receive contrasting views that the interface is not very user friendly. This is definitely constructive for the app, once the team addresses these issues, the app is finer comparatively.
Most often people in the group have opinions that might not fall on the same page, Dissent in a group can lead to an alternative solution that will yield a much austere solution that is in accordance with everyone. For example, A design group working on a project might have altercations and conflicts in a group about the aesthetics or feasibility of the design. By coming together, discussing and find a solution that acceptable to all will spontaneously lead to a better product design that is appealing to a wider range of people. The group represents a microcosm of the large world with conflicting opinions.
One can argue that discussion with people can be demotivating. certainly, people have prejudice and act accordingly and most things are subjective and the attribute that one doesn’t like might be someone else favourite. Further adding certain people can not be pleased no matter what and discussing with such people might surely not lead to any progress, only dissatisfaction.
In my opinion, any opinion contrasting or congruent is still important and must not be overlooked. Meticulously looking into these opinions will bring progress to a deadlock situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 65, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Certainly
...ussion with people can be demotivating. certainly, people have prejudice and act accordin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...t like might be someone else favourite. Further adding certain people can not be please...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, look, so, still, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15223097113 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94900082022 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51968503937 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5691942932 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.055555556 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280987094983 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919959407469 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644313826068 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148523781565 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893955381079 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.